94 Chapter 5 Nouns and noun phrases
criticism is related to criticise, the complement of the noun that corresponds to the
object of the verb has the form of a PP:
[31) VERB + OBJECT
a. I criticised her decision.
ii a. He abandoned his ship.
iii a. Sandy married Pat.
NOUN + pp COMPLEMENT
b. my criticism of her decision
b. his abandonment of his ship
b. Sandy's marriage to Pat
The preposition is usually of, as in lib] and [iib], but with certain nouns other prepo
sitions are selected, as in [iiib].
Complements in NP structure are therefore virtually restricted to PPs and subor
dinate clauses.
pp complements
Dependents with the form of PPs qualify as complements when they are licensed
by the particular head noun. The clearest cases have one or more of the following
properties.
(a) They correspond to object or subject NPs in clause structure. The object case
has been illustrated in [31), while correspondence with a subject is seen in [32]:
[32) SUBJECT + VERB
a. The warriors returned.
ii a. The premier attacked.
NOUN + pp COMPLEMENT
b. the return of the warriors
b. an attack by the premier
This type of PP complement can combine with one corresponding to the object in
a clause, as in the removal of the files by the secretary -cf. The secretary removed
the files. (For the construction with a genitive NP, as in the warriors' return or the
premier's attack, see §9.l.)
(b) The choice of preposition is specified by the head noun. Many nouns take
complements headed by a particular preposition:
[33) their belief in God, its effe ct on the audience, fa miliarity with the data,
the introduction to the book, a request Jm:. more staff, secession from the
alliance
(c) The PP is obligatory because the noun makes little sense without it.
[34) the advent of the steam engine, the abandonment of sensible budgetary
policies, a dearth of new ideas, the fe asibility of the proposal, a paucity gJ
reliable data
The nouns in [34] almost always occur with a PP headed by of, and even if someone
did say something like What's the fe asibility?, we would have to understand them
as having asked about the feasibility of some particular planned action that they had
left to be understood from the context.