ambush?—barred  their   way.    Perhaps it  was the cave    lions   that    stopped
them.
Life    in  the higher  latitudes   has always  been    precarious  and,    by  some
estimates,  the Russian Far East    has never   supported   more    than    a   thousand
tigers. Due to  the extreme climate and its impact  on  prey    density,    large
mammals,    in  general,    are more    sparsely    distributed in  the taiga   than    in
the tropics.    As  a   result, Amur    tigers  must    occupy  far larger  territories
than    other   subspecies  in  order   to  meet    their   needs   for prey.   In  Primorye,
these   territories can be  so  large   that,   after   trying  to  follow  several tigers
on  their   winter  rounds, a   pioneering  tiger   researcher  named   Lev Kaplanov
speculated  in  the early   1940s   that    Amur    tigers  were    simply  wanderers.
“The    entire  winter  life    of  a   solitary    tiger   takes   place   as  a   sequence    of  long
journeys,”   wrote   Kaplanov,   the     Amur    tiger’s     most    famous  early
advocate.^1     “The    tiger   is  a   born    nomad.”
The tiger   was first   classified  as  a   distinct    species of  cat in  1758.   The
subspecies  known   variously   as  the Korean, Manchurian, Siberian,   Ussuri,
Woolly, or  Amur    tiger   was first   designated  Felis   tigris  altaica in  1844.
Since   then,   the taxonomic   scent   tree    has been    marked  and marked  again,
to  the point   that    this    subspecies  has been    reclassified    seven   times.  The
last    man to  stake   his claim   was Nikolai Baikov, a   lifetime    member  of  the
Society  for     Study   of  the     Manchurian  Territory,  and     of  the     Russian
Academy of  Sciences.   In  his monograph   “The    Manchurian  Tiger,” Baikov
begins  by  paying  homage  to  the explorer    Vladimir    Arseniev    and to  the
novelist    Mayne   Reid    (The    Headless    Horseman,   etc.).  He  then    proceeds    to
go   out     on  a   limb    that    both    of  those   brave   romantics   would   have
appreciated:     in  Baikov’s    opinion,    the     creature    he  reclassified    as Felis
tigris  mandshurica was no  ordinary    tiger   but a   living  fossil—a    throwback
to  the Pliocene    worthy  of  designation as  a   distinct    species.    “Its    massive
body    and powerful    skeletal    system  are reminiscent of  something   ancient
and obsolete,”  wrote   Baikov  in  1925.^2     “The    Far East    representative  of  the
giant   cat is  ... extremely   close,  both    in  its anatomical  structure,  and in  its
way of  life,   to  the fossil  cave    tiger,  Machairodus,    a   contemporary    of  the
cave    bear    and the wooly   mammoth.”
