Handbook of Plant and Crop Physiology

(Steven Felgate) #1

  1. JS Boyer. Advances in drought tolerance in plants. Adv Agron 56:187–218, 1996.

  2. NC Turner. Further progress in crop water relations. Adv Agron 58:293–338, 1997.

  3. MA Sanderson, DW Stair, MA Hussey. Physiological and morphological responses of perennial forages to
    stress. Adv Agron 59:171–224, 1997.

  4. AK Joshi. Genetic factors affecting abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants. In: M Pessarakli, ed. Handbook of
    Plant and Crop Stress. 2nd ed. New York: Marcel Dekker, 1999, pp 795–826.

  5. IM Rao, DK Friesen, M Osaki. Plant adaptation to phosphorus-limited tropical soils. In: M Pessarakli, ed.
    Handbook of Plant and Crop Stress. 2nd ed. New York: Marcel Dekker, 1999, pp 61–96.

  6. AF Raybold, AJ Gray. Genetically modified crops and hybridization with wild relatives: a UK perspective. J
    Appl Ecol 30:199–219, 1993.

  7. LT Evans, RA Fischer. Yield potential: its definition, measurement, and significance. Crop Sci 39:1544–1551,
    1999.

  8. RB Austin. Yield of wheat in the United Kingdom: recent advances and prospects. Crop Sci 39:1604–1610,
    1999.

  9. DN Duvick, KG Cassman. Post–green revolution trends in yield potential of temperate maize in the North-Cen-
    tral United States. Crop Sci 39:1622–1630, 1999.

  10. S Peng, KG Cassman, SS Virmani, J Sheehy, GS Khush. Yield potential trends of tropical rice since the release
    of IR8 and the challenge of increasing rice yield potential. Crop Sci 39:1552–1559, 1999.

  11. MP Reynolds, S Rajaram, KD Sayre. Physiological and genetic changes of irrigated wheat in the post–green
    revolution period and approaches for meeting projected global demand. Crop Sci 39:1611–1621, 1999.

  12. M Tollenaar, J Wu. Yield improvement in temperate maize is attributable to greater stress tolerance. Crop Sci
    39:1597–1604, 1999.

  13. LT Evans. Adapting and improving crops: the endless task. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser B 352:41–46, 1997.

  14. RS Loomis, JS Amthor. Yield potential, plant assimilatory capacity, and metabolic efficiencies. Crop Sci
    39:1584–1596, 1999.

  15. JE Specht, DJ Hume, SV Kumudini. Soybean yield potential—a genetic and physiological perspective. Crop
    Sci 39:1560–1570, 1999.

  16. BR Buttery, RI Buzzell, WI Findlay. Relationships among photosynthetic rate, bean yield and other characters
    in field-grown cultivars of soybean. Can J Plant Sci 61:191–198, 1981.

  17. S Ceccarelli, E Acevedo, S Grando. Analytical breeding for stress environments: single traits, architecture of
    traits or architecture of genotypes. Euphytica 56:169–185, 1991.

  18. J Moorby. Can models hope to guide change? Ann Bot 60:175–188, 1987.

  19. R Shorter, RJ Lawn, GL Hammer. Improving genetic adaptation of crops—a role for breeders, physiologists
    and modellers. Exp Agric 27:155–175, 1991.

  20. KJ Boote, M Tollenaar. Modeling genetic yield potential. In: KJ Boote, JM Bennett, TR Sinclair, GM Paulson,
    eds. Physiology and Determination of Crop Yield. Madison, WI: ASA-CSSA-SSSA, 1994, pp 533–565.

  21. M Koornneef, C Alonso-Blanco, AJM Peters. Genetic approaches in plant physiology. New Phytol 137:1–8,
    1997.

  22. J-L Prioul, S Quarrie, M Causse, D Vienne. Dissecting complex physiological functions through the use of
    molecular quantitative genetics. J Exp Bot 48:1151–1163, 1997.

  23. MD Edwards, CW Stuber, JF Wendel. Molecular-marker-facilitated investigations of quantitative-trait loci in
    maize. 1. Numbers, distribution and types of gene action. Genetics 116:113–125, 1987.

  24. MD Edwards, T Helentjaris, S Wright, CW Stuber. Molecular-marker-facilitated investigations of quantitative-
    trait loci in maize. 4. Analysis based on genome saturation with isozyme and restriction fragment length poly-
    morphism markers. Theor Appl Genet 83:765–774, 1992.

  25. M Yano, T Sasaki. Genetic and molecular dissection of quantitative traits in rice. Plant Mol Biol 35:145–153,
    1997.

  26. BP Forster, JR Russell, RP Ellis, LL Handley, D Robinson, CA Hackett, E Nevo, R Waugh, DC Gordon, R
    Keith, W Powell. Locating genotypes and genes for abiotic stress tolerance in barley: a strategy using maps,
    markers and the wild species. New Phytol 137:141–147, 1997.

  27. BP Forster, RP Ellis, WTB Thomas, AC Newton, R Tuberosa, D This, RA El-Enein, MH Bahri, M Ben Salem.
    The development and application of molecular markers for abiotic stress tolerance in barley. J Exp Bot
    51:19–27, 2000.

  28. SD Tanksley, SR McCouch. Seed banks and molecular maps: unlocking genetic potential from the wild. Sci-
    ence 277:1063–1066, 1997.

  29. MW Humphreys, I Pasakinskiene, AR James, H Thomas. Physically mapping quantitative traits for stress-re-
    sistance in the forage grasses. J Exp Bot 49:1611–1618, 1998.

  30. CW Stuber, M Polacco, ML Senior. Synergy of empirical breeding, marker-assisted selection, and genomics
    to increase crop yield potential. Crop Sci 39:1571–1583, 1999.

  31. JW White, G Hoogenboom. Simulating effects of genes for physiological traits in a process-oriented crop
    model. Agron J 88:416–422, 1996.

  32. WJ Horst. Fitting maize into sustainable cropping systems on acid soils of the tropics. Presented at the Con-
    sultants Meeting. Vienna, Austria: FAO/IAEA Division, 1999.


ADAPTATION OF BEANS AND FORAGES TO ABIOTIC STRESSES 605

Free download pdf