Handbook of Plant and Crop Physiology

(Steven Felgate) #1

  1. JJ Read, RC Johnson, BF Carver, SA Quarrie. Carbon isotope discrimination, gas exchange, and yield of spring
    wheat selected for abscisic acid content. Crop Sci 31:139–146, 1991.

  2. GD Farquhar, KT Hubick, AG Condon, RA Richards. Carbon isotope fractionation and plant water-use effi-
    ciency. In: JR Ehleringer, KA Nagy, eds. Stable Isotopes in Ecological Research. Ecological Studies Vol 68.
    New York: Springer-Verlag, 1988, pp 21–40.

  3. PG Jarvis, KG McNaughton. Stomatal control of transpiration: scaling up from leaf to region. Adv Ecol Res
    15:1–49, 1986.

  4. CD Walker, RCN Lance. The fractionation of^2 H and^18 O in leaf water of barley. Aust J Plant Physiol
    18:411–425, 1991.

  5. DF Parkhurst, OL Loucks. Optimal leaf size in relation to environment. J Ecol 60:505–537, 1972.

  6. C Johansen, B Baldev, JB Brouwer, W Erskine, WA Jermyn, Lang Li-Juan, BA Malik, A Ahad Miah, SN
    Silim. Biotic and abiotic stresses constraining productivity of cool season food legumes in Asia, Africa and
    Oceania, In: FJ Muehlbauer, WJ Kaiser, eds. Expanding the Production and Use of Cool Season Food
    Legumes. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer, 1994, pp 175–194.

  7. RJ Hanks. Yield and water-use relationships: an overview. In: H Taylor, WR Jordan, TR Sinclair, eds. Limi-
    tations to Efficient Water Use in Crop Production. Madison, WI: American Society of Agronomy, 1983, pp
    393–411.

  8. JF Beerhuizen, RO Slatyer. Effect of atmospheric concentration of water vapor and CO 2 in determining tran-
    spiration-photosynthesis relationships of cotton leaves. Agric Meteorol 2:259–270, 1965.

  9. RW Downes. Effect of light intensity and leaf temperature on photosynthesis and transpiration in wheat and
    sorghum. Aust J Biol Sci 23:775–782, 1970.

  10. KA Shackel, AE Hall. Reversible leaf movements in relation to drought adaptation of cowpeas (Vigna un-
    guiculata(L.)walp.). Aust J Plant Physiol 6:265–276, 1979.

  11. MM Ludlow, O Bjorkman. Paraheliotropic leaf movement in siratro as a protective mechanism against drought
    induced damage to primary photosynthetic reactions: damage by excessive light and heat. Planta 161:505–518,
    1984.

  12. IN Forseth, AH Teramura. Kuozu leaf energy budget and calculated transpiration: the influence of leaflet ori-
    entation. Ecology 67:564–571, 1986.

  13. VS Berg, S Heuchelin. Leaf orientation of soybean seedlings. I. Effect of water potential and photosynthetic
    photon flux density on paraheliotropism. Crop Sci 30:631–638, 1990.

  14. RC Muchow. An analysis of the effects of water deficits on grain legumes grown in a semi-arid environment
    in terms of radiation interception and its efficiency of use. Field Crops Res 11:309–323, 1985.

  15. GR Squire. The Physiology of Tropical Crop Production. Wallingford, UK: CAB International, 1990.

  16. RB Matthews, D Harris, JH Williams, RC Nageswara Rao. The physiological basis for yield differences be-
    tween four genotypes of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea) in response to drought. II. Solar radiation interception
    and leaf movement. Exp Agric 24:203–213, 1988.

  17. SR Ghorashy, JW Pendleton, ME Bernard. Effect of leaf pubescence on transpiration, photosynthetic rate, and
    seed yield of near-isogenic lines of soybean. Crop Sci 11:426–427, 1971.

  18. J Ehleringer. Leaf morphology and reflectance in relation to water and temperature stress. In: NC Turner, PJ
    Kramer, eds. Adaptation of Plants to Water and Temperature Stress. New York: Wiley Interscience, 1980, pp
    295–308.

  19. M Ashraf, F Karim. Screening of some cultivars/lines of black gram (Vigna mungo(L.) Alepper.) for resistance
    to water stress. Trop Agric (Trinidad) 68:57–62, 1991.

  20. DD Baldocchi, SB Verma, NJ Rosenberg. Water use efficiency in a soybean field: influence of plant water
    stress. Agric For Meteorol 34:53–65, 1985.

  21. ED Schulze, AE Hall. Stomatal responses, water loss and CO 2 assimilation rates of plants in contrasting envi-
    ronments. In: OL Lange, PS Nobel, CB Osmond, H Ziegler, eds. Physiological Plant Ecology II, Water Rela-
    tions and Carbon Assimilation. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1982, pp 181–230.

  22. JR Ehleringer, O Bjorkman, HA Mooney. Leaf pubescence: effects on absorptance and photosynthesis in a
    desert shrub. Science 192:376–377, 1976.

  23. JR Ehleringer, HA Mooney. Leaf hairs: effects on physiological activity and adaptive value to a desert shrub.
    Oecologia 37:183–201, 1978.

  24. JM Clarke, RA Richards. The effects of glaucousness, epicuticular wax, leaf age, plant height, and growth en-
    vironment on water loss rates of excised wheat leaves. Can J Plant Sci 68:975–982, 1988.

  25. MCM Paje, MM Ludlow, RJ Lawn. Variation among soybean (Glycine max(L.) Merr.) accessions in epider-
    mal conductance of leaves. Aust J Agric Res 39:363–373, 1988.

  26. JM Clarke, I Ramagosa, S Jana, JP Srivastava, TN McCaig. Relationship of excised leaf water loss rate and
    yield of durum wheat in diverse environments. Can J Plant Sci 69:1075–1089, 1989.

  27. Y Castonguay, AH Markhart. Saturated rates of photosynthesis in water stressed leaves of common bean and
    tepary bean. Crop Sci 31:1605–1611, 1991.

  28. KT Hubick, GD Farquhar, R Shorter. Correlation between water-use efficiency and carbon isotope discrimi-
    nation in diverse peanut (Arachis) germplasm. Aust J Plant Physiol 13:803–816, 1986.


TRANSPIRATION EFFICIENCY AND GENETIC IMPROVEMENT 851

Free download pdf