528 Real Analysis
434.We assume thatα ≤β ≤γ, the other cases being similar. The expression is a
convex function in each of the variables, so it attains its maximum for somex, y, z=a
orb.
Now let us fix three numbersx, y, z∈[a, b], withx≤y≤z. We have
E(x, y, z)−E(x, z, y)=(γ−α)((z−x)^2 −(y−z)^2 )≥ 0 ,
and henceE(x, y, z)≥E(x, z, y). Similarly,E(x, y, z)≥E(y, x, z)andE(z, y, x)≥
E(y, z, x). So it suffices to consider the casesx=a,z=borx=bandz=a. For
these cases we have
E(a, a, b)=E(b, b, a)=(β+γ )(b−a)^2
and
E(a, b, b)=E(b, a, a)=(α+γ )(b−a)^2.
We deduce that the maximum of the expression under discussion is(β+γ )(b−a)^2 ,
which is attained forx=y=a,z=band forx=y=b,z=a.
(Revista Matematica din Timi ̧soara ̆ (Timi ̧soara Mathematics Gazette), proposed by
D. Andrica and I. Ra ̧sa)
435.The left-hand side of the inequality under discussion is a convex function in each
xi. Hence in order to maximize this expression we must choose some of thexi’s equal to
aand the others equal tob. For such a choice, denote byuthe sum of theti’s for which
xi =aand byvthe sum of theti’s for whichxi=b. It remains to prove the simpler
inequality
(ua+bv)
(u
a
+
v
b
)
≤
(a+b)^2
4 ab
(u+b)^2.
This is equivalent to
4 (ua+vb)(ub+va)≤(ua+vb+ub+va)^2 ,
which is the AM–GM inequality applied toua+vbandub+va.
(L.V. Kantorovich)
436.Expanding with Newton’s binomial formula, we obtain
( 1 +x)n+( 1 −x)n=
∑n^2
k= 0
(
n
2 k
)
x^2 k.