Real Analysis 531
(a^21 +a 22 +a^23 )(a 14 +a^42 +a 34 )≥(a^31 +a^32 +a 33 )^2.
This is just the Cauchy–Schwarz inequality applied toa 1 ,a 2 ,a 3 , anda 12 ,a^22 ,a^23.
(Gazeta Matematica (Mathematics Gazette), Bucharest ̆ )
442.Take the natural logarithm of both sides, which are positive becausexi ∈( 0 ,π),
i= 1 , 2 ,...,n, to obtain the equivalent inequality
∑n
i= 1
ln
sinxi
xi
≤nln
sinx
x
.
All we are left to check is that the functionf(t)=lnsinttis concave on( 0 ,π).
Becausef(t)=ln sint−lnt, its second derivative is
f′′(t)=−
1
sin^2 t
+
1
t^2
.
The fact that this is negative follows from sint<tfort>0, and the inequality is proved.
(39th W.L. Putnam Mathematical Competition, 1978)
443.The functionf:( 0 , 1 )→R,f(x)=√ 1 x−xis convex. By Jensen’s inequality,
1
n
∑n
i= 1
xi
√
1 −xi
≥
1
n
∑n
i= 1
xi
√√
√
√ 1 −^1
n
∑n
i= 1
xi
=
1
√
n(n− 1 )
.
We have thus found that
x 1
√
1 −x 1
+
x 2
√
1 −x 2
+···+
xn
√
1 −xn
≥
√
n
n− 1
.
On the other hand, by the Cauchy–Schwarz inequality
n=n
∑n
i= 1
xi≥
( n
∑
i= 1
√
xi
) 2
,
whence
∑n
i= 1
√
xi≤
√
n. It follows that
√
x 1 +
√
x 2 +···+
√
xn
√
n− 1
≤
√
n
n− 1
.
Combining the two inequalities, we obtain the one from the statement.