Encyclopedia of Environmental Science and Engineering, Volume I and II

(Ben Green) #1

320 ENERGY SOURCES—ALTERNATIVES


power plant. It was assumed that 0.95 lb of coal was burned at
the power plant for each mile of vehicle travel. In this case the
emissions would also include an SO 2 release of 16.25 g/mile
if the coal contained 2% sulfur and no control were provided.
This actual situation however will change when coal fired
centralized power plants are equipped with desulfurization
installations or when in the future the percentage of electricity
produced in nuclear power plants will be much higher.
Diesel engines used in trucks, buses, and trains are
accountable for a small fraction of transportation vehicle
emissions but have local objectionable effects such as smoke
and odor. Aircraft engines have similar effects but in the long
run may be able to effectively utilize alternate fuels such as
methane and hydrogen that will reduce emissions.
The expansion of mass transportation facilities to reduce
automobile usage, especially in urban areas, is an effective
way to utilize energy more efficiently in moving people from
place to place. A bus carrying 50 people and traveling at a
speed of 60 mph may consume about 0.003 gallons of fuel/
passenger mile, while an automobile carrying three people
will consume about 0.023 gallons of fuel/passenger mile
traveling at the same speed with a corresponding increase in
emissions and traffic congestion.

Disintegrated Methods

Analyzing alternative energy sources and alternative energy
economies the centralized social order ruling presently was
compared with disassociated way of life. For this alternative
social order disintegrated methods of energy supply were
suggested. These suggestions start from the point of view
that the effective (final) energies heat, mechanical work and
light can also be produced in small closed systems. As they
must not be available steadily, the temporal not-necessity of

these models get a favorable valuation in the ranking list.
Investment for connection, transmission and interconnection
become inapplicable as well as measures for environment.
Such considerations lead to self-operating island stations on
the basis of a suitable primary energy, for example, crude
oil or diesel fuel which through conversion may produce
mechanical work, heat, and light. Also biomass or bioener-
gies are part of such computer models. These disintegrated
methods are possibly suitable for peripheral agricultural
structures and may relieve the world energy supply unessen-
tially. In industrialized countries they cannot be applied.

The Problem of Transport

The demand on kinds of effective energies, especially in
industrial countries with cool climate are generally divided
as follows:

percentage of
total supply

possibilities of improvement
of efficiency of conversion
heat 60–69% 10–15%
mechanical
work 25–35% 3–4%
light 1–15% less than 1%

whereby chemical energy as effective energy, which is hard
to inquire statistically and without important share, shall be
neglected here.
In Germany the effective energies were supplied to 43.6%
to private households, 36.8% to the industry and 19.6% to
the field of transport and traffic (all figures valid for 1976).^59
If in the sector transport and traffic the above mentioned
19.6% (48.6 Mio tons SKE) would be again 100%, the fol-
lowing figures refer to

road 85.8%
railroad 5.1%
airlines 6.4%
inland navigation 2.7%

The main part of energy (and that mainly converted from crude
oil) flew into the road traffic—8% of the total primary energy
of the FRG. Railroad traffic, i.e., “Deutsche Bundesbahn”
and private railroad companies, consumed only 5.1% or 0.8%
of the total primary energy consumption. Though road traffic
consumed tenfold of primary energies, the output of transport
amounted only to 2.3-fold of the output of railroad (1976).
Hence it follows that:

1) Railroad is with regard to energy consumption
more economical than road.
2) The electrification of the railroad has reduced
within 10 years the primary energy consumption
to round about 50%.
3) Road traffic offers the greatest possibilities for
saving energy and for the substitution of crude oil
products by electricity.

TABLE 18
Emissions from alternate vehicular power plants

Emissions (g/mile)
HC CO NOx
California standard, 1971a 2.2 23 4
EPA standard for 1975b 0.41 3.4 3
EPA standard for 1976b 0.41 3.4 0.4
Gasoline I-C engine, no controls 11.6 64 5.6
Natural gas I-C enginea 1.5 6 1.5
Diesel enginec 3.5 5 4
Regenerative gas turbinec 0.32 3.5 1.9
Stirling enginec 0.1 1.0 2.6
Steam enginea 0.2 1.0 0.4
Electric battery vehicled 0.04 — 4.3
a Congressional Record H 903, February 17, 1970.
b Federal Register, July 2, 1971, pp. 12658.
c Personal communication, R. Tom Sawyner.
d Reference 58; emissions in this case are from a coal-fired central power plant
and also include about 16.25 g of SO 2 /mile and 2.1 g particulates/mile.

C005_006_r03.indd 320C005_006_r03.indd 320 11/18/2005 12:05:49 PM11/18/2005 12:05:49 PM

Free download pdf