361
ENVIRONMENTAL LAW
1
Environmental Law can be defi ned as those statutes, admin-
istrative regulations, executive orders, court decisions and
international agreements that pertain to protection of Nature
and human beings from the consequences of unwise resource
extraction, production or development and the procedural
means by which these ‘laws’ can be invoked by citizens and
government.
Constitutionally, the United States exhibits a federal
system: Law making and enforcement power is divided
among the Federal government, the fi fty State governments,
regional units and local governments according to formulas
contained in Federal and State constitutions and statutes.
Environmental Law is a complex and delicate set of rela-
tionship among various levels of government. For example
the Clean Water Act on the federal level establishes the gen-
eral framework of water pollution control laws, empower-
ing the Federal Environment Protection Agency (EPA) to
set federal minimum performance standards for discharges
to waterways, distribute grant monies for publicly owned
treatment works and perform backup permitting, surveil-
lance, and enforcement functions. But, in most cases it is
the States that grant discharge permits (which can be stricter
than the federal minimum standards), determine the recipi-
ents of federal grant funds, monitor discharger compliance
and enforce against violators. Water quality management is
frequently a function of substate regional planning agen-
cies. Moreover, in some areas interstate regional organiza-
tions, such as the Delaware River Basin Commission, have
regulatory authority over dischargers. Finally, most munici-
palities possess storm-water and other “public nuisance”
ordinances.
Because of the multi-level nature of Environmental Law
and its administration, there are numerous state, regional and
local variations on the generally uniform federal environ-
mental legal regimes. Consequently, this article will focus
on Federal Environmental Law. Most federal environmental
protection statutes are lengthy and complicated documents.
When augmented by federal executive orders, administra-
tive regulations and judicial interpretations, each federal
statutory system would merit an article unto itself. Rather
than that, the function of this article is to identify and briefl y
describe the major federal environmental protection statutes
and to provide the reader with references so that he or she
can seek out relevant regulations, orders, and decisions if
more information is desired in a particular area. (For each
statute mentioned the United States Code citation is given.)
2
The term “Environmental Law” did not come into general
usage until the enactment of The National Environmental
Policy Act (42 USC 4321 et seq. ) in early 1970. However,
long before NEPA Congress was occupied with conserving
the Nation’s natural resources from reckless despoilation.
For example, Yellowstone National Park was created in 1872
and the US Forest Service, in the United States Department
of Agriculture, was entrusted with the care of forested public
domain lands in 1897. In addition, after World War II Congress
began to legislate in the area of pollution control, culminating
in the major federal pollution control statutes of the 1970’s. The
contemporary body of Federal Environmental Law consists
of laws in the conservation and pollution control areas, along
with key planning and coordination statutes, such as NEPA.
But even more than most fi elds of law, Environmental Law
is constantly changing and evolving as the Nation responds
to shifting priorities and pressures on resources. Thus, cur-
rent information is particularly important when it comes to
Environmental Law.
3
In this section major federal environmental protection statues
will be discussed under the following headings: Right-to-Know
Statutes, Right-to-Sue Statutes, Product-Licensing Statutes;
Standard-Setting Statutes; Cleanup-Response Statutes; and
Conservation Statutes.
RIGHT-TO-KNOW STATUTES
NEPA
NEPA requires each federal agency that proposes a major
federal action which may have a signifi cant effect on the
human environment to prepare and circulate—in draft and
fi nal form—an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) dis-
cussing the environmental impact of the proposed action,
reasonable alternatives, irretrievable commitments of
resources, and the agency’s balance among environmental
C005_010_r03.indd 361C005_010_r03.indd 361 11/18/2005 10:25:15 AM11/18/2005 10:25:15 AM