MARINE SPILLAGE—SOURCES AND HAZARDS 671
2) Simplification of arrangement, particularly by
reduction in number and increased size of cargo
tanks. Typical modern crude oil tankers are
arranged with as few as five center tanks and ten
wing tanks. Secondary arrangement changes have
included elimination of superstructure and houses
amidships, location of all accommodation and
navigation spaces aft and elimination of forward
pump room and fuel bunkers.
3) Speed has remained within the 14 to 16 knot range.
4) Crew size has been reduced substantially, averag-
ing as low as 19 men on U.S. flag as well as for-
eign tankers.
5) Propulsion system power levels have increased with
size, approaching 40,000 SHP on a single screw.
Centralized pilot house control of all propulsion
machinery is a state-of-the-art development avail-
able to operators of diesel and steam turbine
machinery.
6) Cargo pumping systems are generally similar to
those of the post World War II period, except for
increase in pumping rate with ship size. Elimination
of pump rooms and fitting of deep well pumps in
each cargo tank is a recent trend, following the
arrangements of special products carriers.
Regulatory effects on tanker design, imposed since the 1973
MARPOL Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from
Ships, have been significant. These regulations, imposed
progressively from 1973 through 1985, include the follow-
ing requirements and constraints:
1) Limitation on maximum cargo tank size to 30,000
cubic meters.
2) Segregated ballast tanks (SBT) on all new tankers
larger than 20,000 DWT capacity. SBT capac-
ity must be sufficient to obtain the following
conditions:
- Capacity to obtain minimum mean ballast
draft of 0.02L 2 meters, where L length
between perpendiculars - Trim by the stern no greater than 0.015L
- Draft at the stern sufficient to submerge the
propeller - SBT located to so as to protect 30% to 40%
of the side shell in way of the cargo tanks.
(Actual requirements vary with ship size and
geometry.)
Since the segregated ballast tanks are restricted to clean bal-
last service only, the net effect of these requirements has
been to increase the ship dimensions to accommodate the
required SBT volume. As a result, modern tankers that meet
the SBT requirements are volume rather than weight limited,
and will only load to the assigned draft marks when carrying
very dense cargoes.
The SBT capacity requirements are considerable,
amounting to about 25% to 40% of the deadweight. The
optimum SBT and cargo tank arrangements, for minimum
ship acquisition cost, vary with ship size and proportions.
A common arrangement is to assign two pairs of wing tanks
within the cargo tank section to SBT service. In some cases
the preferred arrangement is the concentration of segregated
ballast in double bottom tanks extending under the entire
length of the cargo tank section of the ship.
Table 1 include a summary of principal characteristics of
U.S. flag tank vessels built since 1977. All meet the MARPOL
SBT requirements. The SBT arrangements are reviewed later
in connection with protection from collision and grounding.
Special Products A great variety of liquid products are
carried in specially constructed tankers. While the quanti-
ties carried are small compared to the volume of petroleum
FIGURE 3 Outline midship sections through cargo
holds, typical dry bulk carriers.
CARGO HOLD
CARGO HOLD
CARGO HOLD
BALLAST
(c) ORE CARRIER
BALLAST
BALLAST BALLAST BALLAST
BALLAST BALLAST BALLAST
BALLAST
(b) DRY BULK CARRIER, DOUBLE SKIN SIDE SHELL
(a) DRY BULK CARRIER, SINGLE SKIN SIDE SHELL
GRAIN OR
BALLAST
GRAIN OR
BALLAST
GRAIN OR
BALLAST
GRAIN OR
BALLAST
C013_003_r03.indd 671C013_003_r03.indd 671 11/18/2005 10:40:59 AM11/18/2005 10:40:59 AM