MOBILE SOURCE POLLUTION 707
between 99 and 100% of (ATFR) STO. Above this range NO x
levels increase markedly as ATFR is increased; below this
range CO and HC levels increase as ATFR is decreased.
Electric vehicles (EV’s) operated by high energy high
powered batteries are making great strides toward commer-
cialization. The near term goal is to provide over 100 miles
per recharge at accelerations capable of matching the internal
combustion engine. The California Air Resources Board has
issued a technical document in December of 1995 supporting
the concept of such vehicles. The key performance parameter
for EV’s is its specifi c energy (or energy density), measured
in watthours per kilogram, with a near term goal of 80–100
wh/kg, suggested by the US Advanced Battery Consortium
(USABC).^38 Another important measure of performance is the
peak specifi c power (or power density), which gives us an idea
of an EV’s acceleration. It is measured in units of watts per
kg with an USABC near term goal of 150 w/kg that can be
sustained for 30 seconds during discharge down to 80% depth
of discharge. A comparison of different chemical system per-
formance parameters is presented in Figure 4. All of the bat-
teries are expected to achieve the USABC’s midterm goals for
these EV parameters, which coincide with lasting about fi ve
years (-600 cycles) and costing no more than $150 per kwhr of
battery capacity. Hybrid power electric-diesel engines becameavailable in 1995. They alternate between diesel power opera-
tion at 2000–2600 RPM where its effi ciency is best to battery
power at other RPM.RELATED TRANSPORTATION PROBLEMSDiesel Exhaust OdorsDiesel engines are found in buses, trucks, off-road vehicles
and power applicators and increasingly in automobiles. Public
reaction to diesel-engine exhaust odors provides the impetus
for controlling effl uents of that type of fuel combustion.^24
A list of oily kerosene and smokyburnt odor compound iden-
tifi ed by A.D. Little, Inc. is included in Table 4. Exhaust odor
and smoke from diesel engines are more objectionable than
those from spark ignition. CO emissions are generally less
serious but NO x is troublesome (4 to 10 g/mile). Improved
fuel injection and afterburners are considered to be the most
promising of the existing control methods. The injection dif-
fers from the internal combustion engine in that fuel does not
enter the cylinder as a mixture with air, but is injected under
high pressure into the chamber in exact quantities through
low tolerance nozzles. For NO x removal the basic approachesWithout
RecycleWith
RecycleWithout Recycle
With RecycleWithout Recycle
With RecycleCO = 030 60 90 120 0 30
TIME, SECONDS60 90 120 0 30 60 90 12010004242604020PPM NO% O2% COMPHBEFORE CATALYSTS AFTER MONEL AFTER BOTH CATALYSTS~FIGURE 3C013_005_r03.indd 707C013_005_r03.indd 707 11/18/2005 10:42:29 AM11/18/2005 10:42:29 AM