MOBILE SOURCE POLLUTION 709
are engine refi nement, fuel additives, catalytic conversion
and reduction of peak combustion temperature.
Gas Turbines
The exhaust of gas turbines contains perhaps less pollutants
than that of any other internal combustion process. The
high airport traffi c density makes the problem a real one,
however. Sulfur dioxide emissions are low, but the smoke
and odor producing compound levels are high. For auto-
mobile use, the total mass of gas turbine exhaust is many
times greater than that for the gasoline engine of equivalent
power. Hydrocarbon and CO mass emissions are known to
be low and diffi cult to reduce. A greater deal of the pollu-
tion control work underway is in the engine modifi cation
area. In aircraft the turbofan engine is largely replacing the
turbojet. Turbofans bypass some of the air past the engine
and rejoin it with the burner gases at the exhaust tailpipe.
Modern dry NO x combustion systems can obtain emissions
of 25 ppm at 15% O 2. 36,37
The airplane is a much more effi cient carrier (pollu-
tion wise) than the automobile, on a people × miles basis.
Aircraft engine research has been concerned primarily with
smoke reduction. Fuel type, fuel additives and combustion
chamber design have been the primary variables studied.
PARTICULATE EMISSIONS
The particulate matter emitted from automobiles has been
characterized^25 as consisting of “lead salts, alkaline earth
compounds, iron oxides, soot carbonaceous material, and
tars. This material ranges in size from large fl akes to submi-
cron particles and varies in consistency from hard and brittle
particulate to oil mists. Some of the particulate material is
generated in the engine combustion chamber and nucleated
and agglomerated in the vehicle exhaust system before it
passes out the tail pipe. On the other hand, a large portion of
the particulate material generated in the engine subsequently
deposits on various surfaces of the exhaust system. At some
later time, this deposited material fl akes off and becomes
reentrained in the exhaust gas to be emitted from the vehicle.
Obviously, opportunities exist for various types of chemi-
cal and physical processes to take place and, as a result, the
overall particulate emission process for a vehicle is quite
complex and diffi cult to defi ne.”
CYCLE LIFE
2004
2000
2000
1998
2002
USABC long-term goal
USABC
midterm
goal
Nickel- Lead-acid
cadmium
Nickel-
metal
hydride
Lithium-
ion
Sodium-
sulfur
Sodium-
nickel
chloride
2500
2000
1500
1000
500
0
FIGURE 4: Performance Parameter Comparison for Electric Vehicles as a Function of Advanced Battery Type (After Moore^38 ).
C013_005_r03.indd 709C013_005_r03.indd 709 11/18/2005 10:42:30 AM11/18/2005 10:42:30 AM