11.5 SURFACE INTEGRALS
independent of the path taken. Sinceais conservative, we can writea=∇φ. Therefore,φ
must satisfy
∂φ
∂x
=xy^2 +z,
which implies thatφ=^12 x^2 y^2 +zx+f(y, z) for some functionf. Secondly, we require
∂φ
∂y
=x^2 y+
∂f
∂y
=x^2 y+2,
which impliesf=2y+g(z). Finally, since
∂φ
∂z
=x+
∂g
∂z
=x,
we haveg=constant=k. It can be seen that we have explicitly constructed the function
φ=^12 x^2 y^2 +zx+2y+k.
The quantityφthat figures so prominently in this section is called thescalar
potential functionof the conservative vector fielda(which satisfies∇×a= 0 ), and
is unique up to an arbitrary additive constant. Scalar potentials that are multi-
valued functions of position (but in simple ways) are also of value in describing
some physical situations, the most obvious example being the scalar magnetic
potential associated with a current-carrying wire. When the integral of a field
quantity around a closed loop is considered, provided the loop does not enclose
a net current, the potential is single-valued and all the above results still hold. If
the loop does enclose a net current, however, our analysis is no longer valid and
extra care must be taken.
If, instead of being conservative, a vector fieldbsatisfies∇·b=0(i.e.b
is solenoidal) then it is both possible and useful, for example in the theory of
electromagnetism, to define avector fieldasuch thatb=∇×a.Itmaybeshown
that such a vector fieldaalways exists. Further, ifais one such vector field then
a′=a+∇ψ+c,whereψis any scalar function andcis any constant vector, also
satisfies the above relationship, i.e.b=∇×a′. This was discussed more fully in
subsection 10.8.2.
11.5 Surface integrals
As with line integrals, integrals over surfaces can involve vector and scalar fields
and, equally, can result in either a vector or a scalar. The simplest case involves
entirely scalars and is of the form
∫
S
φdS. (11.8)
As analogues of the line integrals listed in (11.1), we may also encounter surface
integrals involving vectors, namely
∫
S
φdS,
∫
S
a·dS,
∫
S
a×dS. (11.9)