24.9 CAUCHY’S THEOREM
namely Cauchy’s theorem, which is the cornerstone of the integral calculus of
complex variables.
Before discussing Cauchy’s theorem, however, we note an important result
concerning complex integrals that will be of some use later. Let us consider the
integral of a functionf(z) along some pathC.IfMis an upper bound on the
value of|f(z)|on the path, i.e.|f(z)|≤MonC,andLis the length of the pathC,
then
∣
∣
∣
∣
∫
C
f(z)dz
∣
∣
∣
∣≤
∫
c
|f(z)||dz|≤M
∫
C
dl=ML. (24.39)
It is straightforward to verify that this result does indeed hold for the complex
integrals considered earlier in this section.
24.9 Cauchy’s theorem
Cauchy’s theoremstates that iff(z) is an analytic function, andf′(z) is continuous
at each point within and on a closed contourC,then
∮
C
f(z)dz=0. (24.40)
In this statement and from now on we denote an integral around a closed contour
by
∮
C.
To prove this theorem we will need the two-dimensional form of the divergence
theorem, known as Green’s theorem in a plane (see section 11.3). This says that
ifpandqare two functions with continuous first derivatives within and on a
closed contourC(bounding a domainR)inthexy-plane, then
∫∫
R
(
∂p
∂x
+
∂q
∂y
)
dxdy=
∮
C
(pdy−qdx). (24.41)
Withf(z)=u+ivanddz=dx+idy, this can be applied to
I=
∮
C
f(z)dz=
∮
C
(udx−vdy)+i
∮
C
(vdx+udy)
to give
I=
∫∫
R
[
∂(−u)
∂y
+
∂(−v)
∂x
]
dx dy+i
∫∫
R
[
∂(−v)
∂y
+
∂u
∂x
]
dx dy. (24.42)
Now, recalling thatf(z) is analytic and therefore that the Cauchy–Riemann
relations (24.5) apply, we see that each integrand is identically zero and thusIis
also zero; this proves Cauchy’s theorem.
In fact, the conditions of the above proof are more stringent than they need
be. The continuity off′(z) is not necessary for the proof of Cauchy’s theorem,