14-Arbitrage Page 418 Wednesday, February 4, 2004 1:08 PM
4181The Mathematics of Financial Modeling and Investment Management1 pω1 = ---------- ∑ P({}ω Akt)πs()ωRts, = ---------- ∑ -----------------π ()ωRts
π π ω ∈A
kt
PAkt)s
(,
Akt ω ∈Akt Akt1 ≤k ≤MtSubstituting in the previous equation, we obtain, for each interval (t,T),πA
kt
R 0 ,t
ξAkt = (Et[]ξT)A = ---------------------
kt π
A 10which we can rewrite in the usual notation asπtR 0 ,t
ξt = Et[]ξT = ----------------
π 10We can now state the following result. Consider any ℑj-measurable
variable xj. This condition can be expressed equivalently stating that xj
assumes constant values on each set of the partition Ij. Then the follow-
ing relationship holds:E P^1
t xjQ[]= E
t ----[ξjxj]
ξtTo see this, consider the following demonstration, which hinges on the
fact that xj assumes a constant value on each Ahj and, therefore, can be
taken out of sums. In addition, as demonstrated above, from1 = -----^1 E
t[πsRts, ]
πtthe following relationship holds:PA( kt)πA ω ,
kt= ∑ pωπ ()s Rts
ω ∈Akt1 ≤k ≤Mt