research,edited by N. Denzin and
Y. Lincoln, pp. 286–305. Thousand
Oaks, CA: Sage.
Smith, Mary Lee, and Gene V. Glass.
(1987). Research and evaluation in
education and the social sciences.
Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Smith, Robert B. (1987). Linking quality
and quantity. Part I: Understanding
and explanation. Quantity and Qual-
ity,21:291–311.
Smith, Robert B. (1988). Linking quality
and quantity, Part II: Surveys as for-
malizations. Quantity and Quality,
22:3–30.
Smith, Rogers M. (1996). Science, non-
science and politics. In The historic
turn in the human sciences,edited by
T. McDonald, pp. 119–159. Ann
Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Smith, Tom W. (1984). The subjectivity
of ethnicity. In Surveying subjective
phenomena,Vol. 2, edited by C.
Turner and E. Martin, pp. 117–128.
New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Smith, Tom W. (1987). That which we
call welfare by any other name would
smell sweeter: An analysis of the im-
pact of question wording on response
patterns. Public Opinion Quarterly,
51:75–83.
Smith, Tom W. (1989). Random probes
of GSS questions. International
Journal of Public Opinion Research,
1:305–325.
Smith, Tom W. (1992). Thoughts on the
nature of context effects. In Context
effects in social and psychological re-
search,edited by N. Schwarz and
S. Sudman, pp. 163–184. New York:
Springer-Verlag.
Smith, Tom W. (1995). Trends in non-
response rates. International Jour-
nal of Public Opinion Research,7:
156–171.
Smith, Tom W. (2002). The Muslim pop-
ulation of the United States. Public
Opinion Quarterly,66:404–417.
Smith, Tom W. (2003). Developing com-
parable questions in cross-national
surveys. In Cross-cultural survey
methods,edited by J. Harkness,
F. Van de Vijver, and P. Mohler, pp.
69–91. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Smith, Tom W. (2004). Developing and
evaluating cross-national survey in-
struments. In Methods for testing and
evaluating survey questionnaires,
edited by S. Presser et al., pp. 431–452.
New York: Wiley.
Smith, Tom W. (2009). General social
survey codebook, appendix A:
Sampling design & weighting.
http:// publicdata.norc.org:41000/gss/
Documents/Codebook/A.pdf.
Accessed July 30, 2010.
Smith, Wayne, Paul Mitchell, Karin
Attebo, and Stephen Leeder. (1997).
Selection bias from sampling frames:
Telephone directory and electoral roll
compared with door-to-door popula-
tion census. Australian and New
Zealand Journal of Public Health,
21(2):127–133.
Smyth, Jolene D., Don A. Dillman, Leah
Melani Christian, and Mallory
Mcbride. (2009). Open-ended ques-
tions in web surveys: Can increasing
the size of answer boxes and provid-
ing extra verbal instructions improve
response quality? Public Opinion
Quarterly,73(2):325–337.
Sniderman, Paul M., and Douglas Grob.
(1996). Innovation in experimental
design in attitude surveys. Annual
Review of Sociology,22:377–399.
Sniderman, Paul M., and Michael Gray
Hagen. (1985). Race and inequality:
A study in American values.
Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
Snow, David A., Susan G. Baker, Leon
Anderson, and Michael Martin.
(1986b). The myth of pervasive men-
tal illness among the homeless.
Social Problems,33:407–423.
Snow, David A., E. Burke Bochford,
Jr., Steven K. Worden, and Robert
D. Benford. (1986a). Frame align-
ment process, micromobilization and
movement participation. American
Sociological Review,51:464–481.
Sobal, Jeffery. (1984). The content of sur-
vey introductions and the provision
of informed consent. Public Opinion
Quarterly,48:788–793.
Sociology Writing Group, UCLA.
(1991). A guide to writing sociology
papers,2nd ed. New York: St. Mar-
tin’s Press.
Sohn-Rethel, Alfred. (1978). Intellectual
and manual labor: A critique of epis-
temology.New York: Macmillan.
Somers, Margaret R. (1994). Reclaiming
the epistemological “other”: Narra-
tive and the social construction of
identity. In Social theory and the pol-
itics of identity,edited by Craig Cal-
houn, pp. 37–99. Cambridge MA:
Blackwell.
Sonquist, J. A., and C. Dunkelberg. (1977).
Survey and opinion research: Proce-
dures for processing and analysis.
Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Sosinsky, Laura Stout, Heather Lord,
and Edward Zigler. (2007). For-profit/
nonprofit differences in center-basedchild care quality. Journal of Applied
Developmental Psychology,28(5/6):
390–410.
Spector, Paul E. (1981). Research
designs.Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Spector, Paul E. (1992). Summated rating
scale construction.Newbury Park,
CA: Sage.
Spradley, James P. (1970). You owe your-
self a drunk.Boston: Little, Brown.
Spradley, James P. (1979a). The ethno-
graphic interview.New York: Holt,
Rinehart and Winston.
Spradley, James P. (1979b). Participant
observation.New York: Holt, Rine-
hart and Winston.
Spradley, James P., and B. J. Mann.
(1975). The cocktail waitress.New
York: Wiley.
Sprague, Joey, and Mary K. Zimmerman.
(1989). Quality and quantity: Recon-
structing feminist methodology.
American Sociologist,20:71–86.
Stack, Carol. (1989). Doing research in
the flats. In In the field,edited by C.
Smith and W. Kornblum, pp. 21–26.
New York: Praeger.
Stack, Steven. (1987). Celebrities and
suicide: A taxonomy and analysis,
1948–1983. American Sociological
Review,52:401–412.
Staggenborg, Susan. (1988). Hired hand
research (revised). American Sociol-
ogist,19:260–269.
Stake, Robert E. (1994). Case studies. In
Handbook of qualitative research,
edited by N. Denzin and Y. Lincoln,
pp. 236–247. Thousand Oaks, CA:
Sage.
Starr, Paul. (1982). The social transfor-
mation of American medicine.New
York: Basic Books.
Starr, Paul. (1987). The sociology of of-
ficial statistics. In The politics of
numbers,edited by W. Alonso and
P. Starr, pp. 7–58. New York: Russell
Sage Foundation.
Stech, Charlotte G. (1981). Trends in non-
response rates, 1952–1979. Public
Opinion Quarterly,45:40–57.
Steensland, Brian, J. Park, M. Regnerus,
L. Robinson, W. Wilcox, and R.
Woodberry. (2000). The measure of
American religion: Toward improv-
ing the state-of-the-art. Social Forces,
79:291–318.
Steinmetz, George. (2005a). Positivism
and its others in the social sciences.
In The politics of method in the
human sciences: Positivism and its
epistemological others,edited by
George Steinmetz,pp. 1–56. Durham,
NC: Duke University Press.BIBLIOGRAPHY