toad    experience, for which   it  wasn’t  designed,   after   all.    Because when    I
used    the same    survey  to  evaluate    my  psilocybin  journey,    the fit seemed
much    better  and rating  the phenomena   much    easier. Reflecting  just    on
the cello   interlude,  for example,    I   could   easily  confirm the “fusion of  [my]
personal    self    into    a   larger  whole,” as  well    as  the “feeling    that    [I]
experienced something   profoundly  sacred  and holy”   and “of being   at  a
spiritual   height” and even    the “experience of  unity   with    ultimate    reality.”
Yes,    yes,    yes,    and yes—provided,   that    is, my  endorsement of  those   loaded
adjectives  doesn’t imply   any belief  in  a   supernatural    reality.
My  psilocybin  journey with    Mary    yielded a   sixty-six   on  the Mystical
Experience  Questionnaire.  For some    reason, I   felt    stupidly    proud   of  my
score.  (There  I   was again,  doing   being.) It  had been    my  objective   to  have
such    an  experience, and at  least   according   to  the scientists  a   mystical
experience  I   had had.    Yet it  had brought me  no  closer  to  a   belief  in  God or
in  a   cosmic  form    of  consciousness   or  in  anything    magical at  all—all of
which   I   might   have    been,   unreasonably,   expecting   (hoping?)   it  might   do.
Still,  there   was no  question    that    something   novel   and profound    had
happened    to  me—something    I   am  prepared    to  call    spiritual,  though  only
with    an  asterisk.   I   guess   I’ve    always  assumed that    spirituality    implied a
belief  or  faith   I’ve    never   shared  and from    which   it  supposedly  flows.  But
now I   wondered,   is  this    always  or  necessarily the case?
Only    in  the wake    of  my  journeys    have    I   been    able    to  unravel the
paradox that    had so  perplexed   me  when    I   interviewed Dinah   Bazer,  a
NYU cancer  patient who began   and ended   her psilocybin  experience  an
avowed  atheist.    During  the climax  of  a   journey that    extinguished    her fear
of  death,  Bazer   described   “being  bathed  in  God’s   love,”  and yet she
emerged with    her atheism intact. How could   someone hold    those   two
warring ideas   in  the same    brain?  I   think   I   get it  now.    Not only    was the
flood   of  love    she experienced ineffably   powerful,   but it  was unattributable
to  any individual  or  worldly cause,  and so  was purely  gratuitous—a    form
of  grace.  So  how to  convey  the magnitude   of  such    a   gift?   “God”   might   be
the only    word    in  the language    big enough.
Part    of  the problem I   was having  evaluating  my  own experience  had to
do  with    another big and loaded  word—“mystical”—implying    as  it  does    an
experience  beyond  the reach   of  ordinary    comprehension   or  science.    It
reeks   of  the supernatural.   Yet I   think   it  would   be  wrong   to  discard the
mystical,   if  only    because so  much    work    has been    done    by  so  many    great
                    
                      frankie
                      (Frankie)
                      
                    
                #1