variance of any unbiased estimator and it expresses a fundamental limitation
on the accuracy with which a parameter can be estimated. We also note that
this lower bound is, in general, a function of , the true parameter value.
Several remarks in connection with the Crame ́r–Rao lower bound (CRLB)
are now in order.
Remark 1: the expectation in Equation (9.26) is equivalent to
,orThis alternate expression offers computational advantages in some cases.
Remark 2: the result given by Equation (9.26) can be extended easily to
multiple parameter cases. Let 1 , 2 ,..., and be the unknown
parameters in which are to be estimated on the basis of a
sample of size n. In vector notation, we can writewith corresponding vector unbiased estimatorF ollowing similar steps in the derivation of Equation (9.26), we can show that
the Crame ́r–Rao inequality for multiple parameters is of the formwhere^1 is the inverse of matrix for which the elements areEquation (9.39) implies thatwhere is the jjth element of^1.
Remark 3: the CRLB can be transformed easily under a transformation of
the parameter. Suppose that, instead of , parameter is of interest,Parameter Estimation 269
.
Efq^2 lnfX;)/q^2 g
^2 ^nE
q^2 lnf
X;
q^21
: 9 : 36
.
mmn)
fx; 1 ,...,m),qT 1 2 m;
9 : 37 Q^T^ 1 ^ 2 ^m:
9 : 38 covfQ^g^1
n; 9 : 39
ijEqlnf
X;q
qiqlnf
X;q
qj; i;j 1 ; 2 ;...;m:
9 : 40 varf^jg
^1 jj
n1
njj; j 1 ; 2 ;...;m;
9 : 41 ^1 )jj g).