Theories_of_Personality 7th Ed Feist

(Claudeth Gamiao) #1
Feist−Feist: Theories of
Personality, Seventh
Edition

II. Psychodynamic
Theories


  1. Freud: Psychoanalysis © The McGraw−Hill^67
    Companies, 2009


A third criterion of any useful theory is its ability to organize knowledgeinto
a meaningful framework. Unfortunately, the framework of Freud’s personality the-
ory, with its emphasis on the unconscious, is so loose and flexible that seemingly in-
consistent data can coexist within its boundaries. Compared with other theories of
personality, psychoanalysis ventures more answers to questions concerning why
people behave as they do. But only some of these answers come from scientific in-
vestigations—most are simply logical extensions of Freud’s basic assumptions.
Thus, we rate psychoanalysis as having only moderate ability to organize knowledge.
Fourth, a useful theory should serve as a guide for the solution of practical
problems.Because Freudian theory is unusually comprehensive, many psychoana-
lytically trained practitioners rely on it to find solutions to practical day-to-day prob-
lems. However, psychoanalysis no longer dominates the field of psychotherapy, and
most present-day therapists use other theoretical orientations in their practice. Thus,
we give psychoanalysis a low rating as a guide to the practitioner.
The fifth criterion of a useful theory deals with internal consistency,including
operationally defined terms. Psychoanalysis is an internally consistent theory, if one
remembers that Freud wrote over a period of more than 40 years and gradually al-
tered the meaning of some concepts during that time. However, at any single point
in time, the theory generally possessed internal consistency, although some specific
terms were used with less than scientific rigor.
Does psychoanalysis possess a set of operationally defined terms? Here the
theory definitely falls short. Such terms as id, ego, superego, conscious, precon-
scious, unconscious, oral stage, sadistic-anal stage, phallic stage, Oedipus complex,
latent level of dreams, and many others are not operationally defined; that is, they are
not spelled out in terms of specific operations or behaviors. Researchers must origi-
nate their own particular definition of most psychoanalytic terms.
Sixth, psychoanalysis is not a simple or parsimonioustheory, but considering
its comprehensiveness and the complexity of human personality, it is not needlessly
cumbersome.


Chapter 2 Freud: Psychoanalysis 61

Concept of Humanity


In Chapter 1, we outlined several dimensions for a concept of humanity. Where does
Freud’s theory fall on these various dimensions?
The first of these is determinism versus free choice.On this dimension Freud’s
views on the nature of human nature would easily fall toward determinism. Freud
believed that most of our behavior is determined by past events rather than molded
by present goals. Humans have little control over their present actions because
many of their behaviors are rooted in unconscious strivings that lie beyond pres-
ent awareness. Although people usually believe that they are in control of their own
lives, Freud insisted that such beliefs are illusions.
Adult personality is largely determined by childhood experiences—especially
the Oedipus complex—that have left their residue in the unconscious mind. Freud
(1917/1955a) held that humanity in its history has suffered three great blows to

Free download pdf