The Sun and News
Your Hometown Newspaper Serving Middleville and Caledonia Areas
No. 35/August 28, 2021 Published by J-Ad Graphics, Inc. • 1351 N. M-43 Highway, Hastings, MI 49058 143rd year
County planners oppose Bay
Pointe rezoning, but OK laundry
facility – with location change
Greg Chandler
Staff Writer
For the second time in
three months, Barry County
planners are opposing a
rezoning request that would
allow Bay Pointe Inn to add
onto its Bay Pointe Woods
cottage complex.
The county planning com-
mission voted 6-1 Monday
night to recommend denial of
the request from Bay Corp.
Inc. to change the zoning on
two parcels, totaling 3.
acres, on Oarie Drive, a pri-
vate drive that serves the
Orangeville Township resort,
from rural residential to
mixed-use. The rezoning
change would allow for the
construction of five two-sto-
ry cottages on the property.
The recommendation now
goes to the county board of
commissioners for final
action, which could come at
its next regular meeting
Tuesday, Sept. 7.
In a separate action, the
planning commission
approved the addition of a
laundry facility to the Bay
Pointe Woods complex, but
not where Bay Pointe owner
Mike Powers wanted it. On a
6-1 vote, commissioners
approved locating the facility
on the west side of the cot-
tages’ parking lot, pending an
administrative review by
county Planning Director Jim
McManus.
Powers expressed disap-
pointment after the meeting.
“We had a good plan for
that area, for the rezoning,
and it would complement
what we’ve already built and
also enhance the whole vital-
ity of the area,” he said.
“Hopefully, we’ll have better
luck at the board of commis-
sioners [meeting].”
Powers said the location
commissioners chose for the
laundry facility is 500 feet
from his preferred location.
He indicated he may pursue
legal action.
“I certainly hope not, but
they may have forced our
hand,” he said. “If that’s our
only alternative, yeah, we’ll
certainly have to [consider
it]. We’re going to fight for
what we feel is right, for the
best location for our guests
and our staff.”
The planning commission
in late June had recommend-
ed denial of the rezoning,
saying a decision should wait
until a new county master
plan is developed. However,
the county board July 20 sent
the rezoning back to the plan-
ning commission, asking
members to re-evaluate the
basis for its recommendation.
“[They] indicated that you
cannot use the concept of a
future land use plan as the
basis of a decision ... That
can’t be done because we
have an existing plan. You
have to use what we have
currently available,”
McManus said.
In his presentation to the
planning commission,
Powers said he regularly has
to send potential guests to
Proposed apartment complex
advances in Gaines Township
James Gemmell
Contributing Writer
The Gaines Township
Planning Commission has
approved and forwarded a
rezoning request for a pro-
posed 348-unit apart-
ment-home development on
60 th Street to the township
board for consideration.
The township board will
have a first reading Sept. 13
on the proposed rezoning and
final site plan for the River
Birch Apartments, followed
by a second reading in the
form of a public hearing
sometime this fall. The
34-acre development would
occupy a combined two-par-
cel site at 3500 and 3540
60 th St. SE, between Wing
and Hanna Lake avenues.
60 th Street is the border
between Gaines Township
and the city of Kentwood.
The rezoning would
change the property from a
residential designation to a
planned unit development.
That would give the develop-
er, BDR Custom Homes,
more flexibility in clustering
buildings for the project.
After various changes
were made over several
months, the township
Planning Commission in July
approved a modified site
plan for the River Birch
Apartments, with multiple
conditions that BDR will
have to meet for the project
to receive ultimate approval.
Among those are restrictions
on building heights, place-
ment of sidewalks, and
reviews by the Kent County
road and drain commissions,
plus the Byron-Gaines Utility
Authority and the Michigan
Department of Environment,
IN THIS ISSUE...
- Fall season previews for Caledonia,
Thornapple Kellogg varsity teams - Wayland fire chief stepping down
after nearly 50 years - Middleville council Oks bridge
inspections - Mask mandate triggers protest
at Caledonia
Middleville legalizes marijuana businesses
Greg Chandler
Staff Writer
After more than two years
of discussion and consider-
able public input, the Village
of Middleville has legalized
marijuana-based businesses
within its borders.
The village council, on
identical 6-1 votes, approved
two ordinances Tuesday
night that legalize the sale
and growing of marijuana in
the village, and set the
ground rules for any marijua-
na-based businesses that set
up shop in the community.
“I’m excited. I’m glad
that, finally, we’re done,”
Village President Amanda
Fisk said after the meeting.
Ordinance No. 2119
amends village zoning to
allow marijuana businesses
as special land uses in areas
zoned for highway commer-
cial or industrial use. Retail
businesses, both for recre-
ational and medical use, are
now allowed in the highway
commercial zoned district,
primarily along M-37.
The ordinance also allows
for marijuana growing opera-
tions in industrial-zoned
areas, primarily on the vil-
lage’s north side. Secure
transporter and safety com-
pliance facilities will be
allowed in both highway
commercial and industri-
al-zoned districts, according
to the ordinance language.
The village planning com-
mission must approve any
special land use requests. No
establishments will be
allowed to set up shop in the
downtown area, and no busi-
ness may be within 1,
feet of an existing school,
church or child care facility.
Hours of operation are limit-
ed to 9 a.m.-9 p.m., accord-
ing to the ordinance lan-
guage.
Ordinance No. 2120 sets a
limit of five licenses to be
allocated by the village, out-
lines the process for getting
approval for each license,
and details criteria for evalu-
ating applications. A maxi-
mum of two retail business-
es, which could sell either
medical or recreational mari-
juana or both, are allowed in
the village, according to the
ordinance.
The village manager will
review and approve the
awarding of licenses, after
the planning commission
approves the special land
use. Businesses would need
to have licenses renewed
annually to remain in opera-
tion. The ordinance also must
be reviewed every two years
to determine whether the cap
on licenses should be
changed.
The ordinances are expect-
ed to take effect Sept. 11 –
seven days after the notice of
the zoning ordinance change
is to be published in the Sun
and News. Under the
Michigan Zoning Enabling
Act, any ordinance change
must be published in a gener-
al circulation newspaper
within 15 days of its adop-
tion, and goes into effect
seven days after publication.
See BUSINESSES, page 3
This is the revised site plan layout of the proposed Gaines Towne Center project.
(Graphic provided)
Planning Commission rejects site
plan for Gaines Towne Center
James Gemmell
Contributing Writer
If the developer of the pro-
posed $100 million Gaines
Towne Center wants the
82-acre mixed-use develop-
ment to go forward, it will
have to make some major
modifications to the plan.
The Gaines Township
Planning Commission voted
3-2 Thursday to reject a
revised site plan proposed by
Indianapolis-based American
Kendall Properties LLC.
Voting to reject the site
plan and rezoning were
Planning Commission
Chairwoman Connie Giarmo,
Vice Chairwoman Ronnie
Rober and Commissioner
Brad Waayenberg. Voting in
favor of the plan were com-
missioners Talimma Billips
and Brad Burns.
Commissioners Lani Thomas
and Tim Haagsma were
absent.
The vote came after
American Kendall owner
Mike Speedy gave a presen-
tation, and citizens got a
chance to speak at a public
hearing.
In February, American
Kendall first proposed build-
ing the Gaines Towne Center
at the southeast corner of
84th Street and Kalamazoo
Avenue, across from the
township hall and Prairie
Wolf Park. It would feature a
pedestrian plaza and small
retail businesses near the
intersection, with apartments,
townhouses, along with sin-
gle- and two-family homes to
the south and east.
There would be 522 total
dwelling units on the site.
That would break down into
278 multi-family units (apart-
ments), 34 mixed-use apart-
ment units, 44 attached sin-
gle-family townhomes, and
166 detached single-family
units. In addition, there also
are six commercial buildings
proposed, 110 senior-living
units, and two outlots that
could be added in the future.
The plan calls for 10 acres of
open space.
The 82-acre site is owned
by Lansing-based Eyde
Company. Grand Rapids-
based Eastbrook Homes
would serve as American
Kendall’s business partner in
developing the first 54 resi-
dential acres of the site.
However, a number of cit-
izens voiced concern to the
planning commission about
what they feel is too high a
density for buildings on that
site, as well as the potential
impact on farmland and wild-
life, among other things.
Township Planner Dan Wells
said the overall site would be
medium density, although a
portion of it would be high
density.
Township resident Roger
Corson said he is worried
about local schools being
“overwhelmed” because of
the multi-family homes and
apartments in the future
development. But Wells said
See REJECTS, page 6
See ADVANCES, page 18
See OPPOSE, page 6