Influence

(lu) #1

NOTES


CHAPTER 1 (PAGES 1–16)


  1. Honest, this animal researcher’s name is Fox. See his 1974 mono-
    graph for a complete description of the turkey and polecat experiment.

  2. Sources for the robin and bluethroat information are Lack (1943)
    and Peiponen (1960), respectively.

  3. Although several important similarities exist between this kind of
    automatic responding in humans and lower animals, there are some
    important differences as well. The automatic behavior sequences of
    humans tend to be learned rather than inborn, more flexible than the
    lock-step patterns of the lower animals, and responsive to a larger
    number of triggers.

  4. Perhaps the common “because...just because” response of children
    asked to explain their behavior can be traced to their shrewd recognition
    of the unusual amount of power adults appear to assign to the raw
    word because.
    The reader who wishes to find a more systematic treatment of Langer’s
    Xerox study and her conceptualization of it can do so in Langer (1989).

  5. Sources for the Photuris and the blenny information are Lloyd (1965)
    and Eibl-Eibesfeldt (1958), respectively. As exploitative as these creatures
    seem, they are topped in this respect by an insect known as the rove
    beetle. By using a variety of triggers involving smell and touch, the rove
    beetles get two species of ants to protect, groom, and feed them as larvae
    and to harbor them for the winter as adults. Responding mechanically
    to the beetles’ trick trigger features, the ants treat the beetles as though
    they were fellow ants. Inside the ant nests, the beetles respond to their
    hosts’ hospitality by eating ant eggs and young, yet they are never
    harmed (Hölldobler, 1971).

  6. These studies are reported by Kenrick and Gutierres (1980), who
    warn that the unrealistically attractive people portrayed in the popular
    media (for example, actors, actresses, models) may cause us to be less

Free download pdf