Asilomar conference WORLD OF MICROBIOLOGY AND IMMUNOLOGY
36
•
species the eggs may or may not be fertilized; fertilized eggs
produce females, while unfertilized eggs produce males.
There are a number of crop plants that are propagated
asexually. The advantage of asexual propagation to farmers is
that the crops will be more uniform than those produced from
seed. Some plants are difficult to cultivate from seed and asex-
ual reproduction in these plants makes it possible to produce
crops that would otherwise not be available for commercial
marketing. The process of producing plants asexually is called
vegetative propagation and is used for such crops as potatoes,
bananas, raspberries, pineapples, and some flowering plants
used as ornamentals. Farmers plant the so-called “eyes” of
potatoes to produce duplicates of the parent. With banana
plants, the suckers that grow from the root of the plant are sep-
arated and then planted as new ones. With raspberry bushes,
branches are bent and covered with soil. They then grow into
a separate plant with their own root system and can eventually
be detached from the parent plant.
See alsoCell cycle and cell division
AAsilomar conferenceSILOMAR CONFERENCE
Soon after American microbiologist Hamilton Smith’s 1970
discovery of the first restriction enzyme, it became possible to
combine DNAfrom different sources into one molecule, pro-
ducing recombinant DNA. Concern by scientists and lay peo-
ple that some of this recombinant-technology DNA might be
harmful to humans prompted the research to stop until scien-
tists could evaluate its risks.
In February 1975 over 100 internationally respected
molecular biologists met at the Asilomar conference center in
California. There they decided upon a set of guidelines to be
followed by all scientists doing recombinant DNA research.
They considered every class of experiment and assigned each
a level of risk: minimal, low, moderate, or high. Each level of
risk required a corresponding set of containment procedures
designed to minimize the chance of vectors (carriers) contain-
ing recombinant DNA molecules from escaping into the envi-
ronment, where they could potentially harm humans or other
parts of the ecosystem. Because these projected experiments
had never been done, assignment to a risk category was, of
course, somewhat speculative and subjective. Accordingly, the
potential risks were arrived at by estimate.
At all risk levels, the guidelines called for the use of bio-
logical barriers. Bacterial host cells should be from strains
unable to survive in natural environments (outside the test
tube). Vectors carrying recombinant DNA, including plas-
mids, bacteriophages, and other viruses, were to be nontrans-
missible and unable to survive in natural environments.
For experiments having minimal risk, the guidelines
recommended that scientists follow general microbiology
safety procedures. These included not eating, drinking, or
smoking in the lab; wearing laboratory coats in the work area;
and promptly disinfecting contaminated materials.
Low-risk procedures required a bit more caution. For
example, procedures producing aerosols, such as using a
blender, were to be performed under an enclosed ventilation
hood to eliminate the risk of the recombinant DNA being lib-
erated into the air.
Moderate-risk experiments required the use of a laminar
flow hood, the wearing of gloves, and the maintenance of neg-
ative air pressure in the laboratory. This would ensure that air
currents did not carry recombinant DNA out of the laboratory.
Finally, in high-risk experiments, maximum precautions
were specified. These included isolation of the laboratory
from other areas by air locks, having researchers shower and
change their clothing upon leaving the work area, and the
incineration of exhaust air from the hoods.
Certain types of experiments were not to be done at all.
These most potentially dangerous experiments included the
cloningof recombinant DNA from highly pathogenic organ-
isms or DNA containing toxin genes. Also forbidden were
experiments involving the production of more than 10 liters of
cultureusing recombinant DNA molecules that might render
the products potentially harmful to humans, animals, or plants.
The scientists at the Asilomar conference also resolved
to meet annually to re-evaluate the guidelines. As new proce-
dures were developed and safer vectors and bacterial cells
became available, it became possible to re-evaluate and relax
some of the initially stringent and restrictive safety standards.
See alsoRecombination; Viral genetics; Viral vectors in gene
therapy
AAtomic force microscopeTOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPE
In 1985, the development of the atomic force microscope
(AFM) allowed scientists to visualize the surface of cellular
structures during some physiological processes. Along with
the use of field ion microscopes and powerful scanning tun-
neling microscopes (STM), these advances in microscopy rep-
resent the most fundamental greatest advances since the
development of the electron microscope.
Budding yeast cells undergoing asexual reproduction; yeast are
single-celled fungi.
womi_A 5/6/03 1:07 PM Page 36