152 III More on Divisibility
1993 Fermat’s assertion had been established in this way for allnless than four million.
However, these methods did not lead to a complete proof of ‘Fermat’s last theorem’.
As will be seen in Chapter XIII, a complete solution was first found by Wiles (1995),
using quite different methods.
3 Multiplicative Functions
We define a functionf :N→Cto be anarithmetical function. The set of all arith-
metical functions can be given the structure of a commutative ring in the following
way.
For any two functions f,g :N→C, we define theirconvolutionorDirichlet
product f∗g:N→Cby
f∗g(n)=
∑
d|n
f(d)g(n/d).
Dirichlet multiplication satisfies the usual commutative and associative laws:
Lemma 24For any three functions f,g,h:N→C,
f∗g=g∗f, f∗(g∗h)=(f∗g)∗h.
Proof Sincen/druns through the positive divisors ofnat the same time asd,
f∗g(n)=
∑
d|n
f(d)g(n/d)
=
∑
d|n
f(n/d)g(d)=g∗f(n).
To prove the associative law, putG=g∗h.Then
f∗G(n)=
∑
de=n
f(d)G(e)=
∑
de=n
f(d)
∑
d′d′′=e
g(d′)h(d′′)
=
∑
dd′d′′=n
f(d)g(d′)h(d′′).
Similarly, if we putF=f∗g, we obtain
F∗h(n)=
∑
de=n
F(e)h(d)=
∑
de=n
∑
d′d′′=e
f(d′)g(d′′)h(d)
=
∑
dd′d′′=n
f(d′)g(d′′)h(d).
HenceF∗h(n)=f∗G(n).