Response
0.0
Agonist s normal response
(antagonist is absent)
Antagonist, ideal case
(agonist is absent)
Concentration agonist
% of the
maximum
response
AX 1 X 2 X 3
0%
Log [agonist]
(b)
Log [agonist]
0%
100%
A
X 1
X 2
X 3
Increasing
concentration
% of the of X
maximum
response
(c)
100%
Concentration of X increasing
(a)
Figure 7.8(a) The effect of an ideal antagonist on the response of a receptor. (b) The effect of
different concentrations of an ideal competitive antagonist X on the dose–response curve for an
agonist A. (c) The effect of different concentrations of non-competitive antagonist on the dose–
response curve of drug A. Key: The A plots are the dose–response curves for the agonist in the
absence of the antgonist X. The X 1 –X 3 plots are the dose–response curves for the agonist A in the
presence of three different concentrations of the antagonist X
same receptor as an agonist but do not cause a response (Figure 7.8(a) ). As the
concentration of the competitive antagonist increases, the response due to
agonist decreases. However, increasing the concentration of the agonist will
reverse this decrease (Figure 7.8(b) ). It is believed that non-competitive antag-
onists bind irreversibly by strong bonds, such as covalent bonds, to allosteric
sites on the receptor. This changes the conformation of the receptor site, which
prevents the binding of the agonist to the receptor. In addition, increasing the
concentration of the agonist does not restore the response of the receptor
(Figure 7.8(c) ).
The ideal starting point for the design of a new antagonist would be the
structure of the receptor. However, it is often difficult to identify the receptor
and also obtain the required structural and stereochemical information. Conse-
quently, although it is not the ideal starting point, many developments start with
the structure and stereochemistry of either the endogenous ligand or any other
known agonists and antagonists for the receptor. Since antagonists exert a
stronger affinity for the receptor than its natural agonist, the binding groups
selected for the new drug are often groups that could form stronger bonds with
146 SELECTED EXAMPLES OF DRUG ACTION AT SOME COMMON TARGET AREAS