130_notes.dvi

(Frankie) #1
Lx =

1

2

(L++L−) =

̄h

2



0 1 0

1 0 1

0 1 0



Ly =

1

2 i

(L+−L−) =

̄h

2 i



0 1 0

−1 0 1

0 −1 0



What is the dimension of the matrices forℓ= 2?
Dimension 5. Derive the matrix operators forℓ= 2.
Just do it.


18.11.2Compute [Lx,Ly] Using Matrices*.


[Lx,Ly] =

̄h^2
2 i





0 1 0

1 0 1

0 1 0





0 1 0

−1 0 1

0 −1 0


−



0 1 0

−1 0 1

0 −1 0





0 1 0

1 0 1

0 1 0





̄h^2
2 i





−1 0 1

0 0 0

−1 0 1


−



1 0 1

0 0 0

−1 0 − 1




= ̄h

2
2 i



−2 0 0

0 0 0

0 0 2


=i ̄h ̄h



1 0 0

0 0 0

0 0 − 1


=i ̄hLz

The other relations will prove to be correct too, as they must. Itsa reassuring check and a calcula-
tional example.


18.11.3Derive the Expression for Rotation OperatorRz*


The laws of physics do not depend on what axes we choose for our coordinate system- There is
rotational symmetry. If we make an infinitesimal rotation (through and angledφ) about the z-axis,
we get the transformed coordinates


x′ = x−dφy
y′ = y+dφx.

We can Taylor expand any functionf,


f(x′,y′) =f(x,y)−
∂f
∂x

dφy+
∂f
∂y

dφx= (1 +
i
̄h

dφLz)f(x,y).

So the rotation operator for the function is


Rz(dφ) = (1 +

i
̄h
dφLz)

A finite rotation can be made by applying the operator for an infinitesimal rotation over and over.
Letθz=ndφ. Then


Rz(θz) = lim
n→∞

(1 +

i
̄h

θz
n
Lz)n=eiθzLz/ ̄h.

The last step, converting the limit to an exponential is a known identity. We can verify it by using
the log of the quantity. First we expandln(x) aboutx= 1:ln(x) =ln(1)+


( 1

x

)

x=1(x−1) = (x−1).

lim
n→∞
ln(1 +
i
̄h

θz
n

Lz)n=n(
i
̄h

θz
n

Lz) =
i
̄h

θzLz

So exponentiating, we get the identity.

Free download pdf