Dollinger index

(Kiana) #1

548 ENTREPRENEURSHIP


be profitable can be written as an equation
where the sum of all future discounted cash
that flows from the new venture is set against
the sum of the direct investment attributable
to the new venture, plus the sum of the ex-
penses related to overcoming the structural
barriers, plus the sum of the expenses related
to retaliation costs (such as price concessions,
marketing, and legal expenses). All too often,
when entrepreneurs make their calculations,
they include only the direct-investment costs
(property, plant, equipment, and initial
organization costs). An opportunity that
looks profitable based on direct costs might
not be profitable when the barrier and re-
taliation costs are factored in.


  1. Retrieved from the Toys “R” Us Web site
    February 6, 2007. http://www.toysrus.com/
    helpdesk/index.jsp?display=safety&subdis-
    play=terms&clickid=botnav_terms_txt.

  2. Exit barriers are those structural impediments
    that prevent inefficient firms from leaving an
    industry even when the firms are unprofitable
    and have little prospect of achieving profitabil-
    ity. Examples of exit barriers are psychological
    commitment by the firm’s owners, specialized
    assets, fixed costs of exit (e.g., labor agree-
    ments), and government policy (e.g., Chrysler
    and Lockheed in the United States).

  3. Porter, 1980: 18–20.

  4. The Federal Trade Commission maintains a
    classification scheme for all businesses. It is
    known as the Standard Industrial Classifica-
    tion code, or SIC for short. All products and
    services are assigned codes that range from
    two to seven digits. Two- and three-digit SIC
    codes are too broad and general to identify
    competitors, and five- through seven-digit
    codes may be too narrow. The four-digit SIC
    code is the one that is generally accepted for
    current and potential competitor analysis.

  5. See Chapter 2 for complete definitions and
    descriptions of the resources and their attrib-
    utes.

  6. Included in the general term strategy here
    would be such elements as the firm’s goals
    and future goals, its assumptions about itself
    and its industry, and its own assessment of its
    strengths and weaknesses


Chapter 4


  1. There are a number of fine textbooks on the
    subject of strategic management. The fol-


lowing list is not meant to be complete or
exclusive: G. Dess and A. Miller, Strategic
Management (New York: McGraw-Hill,
1993); H. Mintzberg and J. Quinn, The
Strategy Process (Upper Saddle River, NJ:
Prentice Hall, 1991); J. Pearce and R.
Robinson,. Strategic Management:
Formulation, Implementation and Control
(Homewood, IL: Irwin, 1992); A. Strick-
land and A. Thompson, Strategic
Management: Text and Cases (Homewood,
IL: Irwin, 1992).


  1. D. Hambrick, “Some Tests of the Effective-
    ness of Functional Attributes of Miles and
    Snow’s Strategic Types,” Academy of Man-
    agement Journal 26, 1983: 5–26.

  2. Probably the second-most important core
    decision that an entrepreneur and the top
    management team can make (after the choice
    of product or service) is customer and market
    selection. Who are you going to sell to and
    in what channel(s)? See J. Magretta, “Why
    Business Models Matter: The Difference
    between Business Models and Strategy,”
    Harvard Business Review 80, no. 1, May
    2002: 86-87; Magretta says a strategy is a
    summary of its intended and preferred modes
    of accomplishing its goals. This differs from
    our own definition given above.

  3. D. Hambrick and J. Fredrickson, “Are You
    Sure You Have a Strategy?” Academy of
    Management Executive15, no. 4, 2001: 48-
    59.

  4. The strategy diamond was suggested as a use-
    ful tool by George Norman of Tufts
    University. I thank Professor Norman for his
    valuable input.

  5. R. Amit and C. Zott, “Value Creation in E-
    business,” StrategicManagement Journal 22,
    2001: 493-520.

  6. K. Kafner, “Wary of a New Web Idea That
    Rings Old,” New York Times,March 24 2006.
    Retrieved from the Web March 24, 2006.
    http://www.nytimes.com/2006/03/24/tech-
    nology/24venture.html.

  7. The original concept and description of entry
    wedges was developed by Karl Vesper. See K.
    Vesper, New Venture Strategies (Upper Saddle
    River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1980). Rev. ed.
    1990.

  8. Vesper, 1990.

  9. P. Drucker, Innovation and Entrepreneurship
    (New York: Harper & Row, 1985).

  10. Drucker, 1985.

Free download pdf