The Beckmann Rearrangement
O
R-C-NHOH <-
(XXV)
eOH
\
O
II •
R_C—OEt
O
O
- R-C-NHNH,
NaNO^
o
HQ
(XXIV)
0=C=N—R
derived from amyl nitrite and hydrogen chloride), the urethane is
obtained:
R—C—Ng
O
II- ..
R—C—N
ROH
R—N=C=0 > R—NHCOjR'
In all these cases, the R group that migrates conserves its configur
ation as in the carbon -^carbon rearrangements already discussed and,
as with them, no mixed products are formed wfcen two different, but
very similar, compounds are rearranged in the*ame solution, sjn»wing
that the R groups never became free in the solution when migrating,
i.e. these too are vrt/YzmolecuIar rearrangements.
(ii) The Beckmann rearrangement
The most famous of the rearrangements in which R migrates from
carbon to nitrogen is undoubtedly the conversion of ketoximes to
N-substituted amides, the Beckmann transformation:
RR C=N OH — R'CONHR or RCONHR'
The reaction is catalysed by a wide variety of acidic reagents, e.g.
H 2 S0 4 , P 206 , SOa, SOCl 2 , BF 3 , PC1 6 , etc., and takes place not only
with the oximes themselves but also with their O-esters. Only a very
few aldoximes rearrange under these conditions but more can be
made to do so#by use of polyphosphoric acid as a catalyst. The most
interesting feature of the change is, that unlike the reactions we have
already considered,it is not the nature, e.g. relative electron-releasing
ability, but the stereochemical arrangement of the R, R' groups that