Life cycle analysis summary of air slide blower on VVVFD concept
S. N. Particulars Conventional System VVVFD Concept
1 Initial Investment
i Type of Stator IMCC-HDOL feeder with pro-V VVVFDii IMCC HDOL Feeder01 no HDOL for FAN is
required – IMCC with
pro V01 no SFU Required for VFD2 Power Consumption
i Speed Control & Reduction Not Possible Possible 10-110% possible & getting Power SavingiiEnergy consumption
as per process
requirementHigh Energy consumed
as per motor rated KWActual Energy consumed
on account of Air Flow &
air Pressure as per Process
requirement.
3 System Installation & Commissioningi System Installation & Commissioning TimeLarge time required, as
more hardware’s in the
systemLess time required, as less
hardware’s in the system
4 Operation & Maintenance
i System reliability Less Efficient compare to VVVFD More Efficient System, 100% Dependency on Driveii System HardwareMore Hardware’s with
the system Compare to
VVVFDLess Hardware’s with
the system Compare to
conventional system
iii System Further optimisation margin Not possible with conventional system Possible with VVVFD SystemS. N. Particulars Cost in Lacs
1 Investment against VFD concept 7.69
2 Investment against conventional concept 8.40
3 Lower investment against VVFD concept -0.71
4 Annual benefit against VVVFD considering approx. 10% speed reduction in energy saving 2.3113.4 Comparison of Conventional System v/s VVVFD Concept.