286 Bibliography
Fish, Stanley. “The Law Wishes to Have a Formal Existence.” In The Fate of Law, ed. Aus-
tin Sarat and Thomas Kearns, 159–208. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press,
1991.
Fleming, Jacqueline. Blacks in College. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1984.
Foley, William. Anthropological Linguistics: An Introduction. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1997.
Forrester, John. “If p, Then What? Thinking in Cases.” History of the Human Sciences 9
(1996): 1–25.
Fox, Mary Frank. “Women and Higher Education: Sex Differentials in the Status of Stu-
dents and Scholars.” In Women: A Feminist Perspective, 3d ed., ed. Jo Freeman, 238–
- Palo Alto, CA: Mayfield, 1984.
Frank, Jerome. “A Disturbing Look at the Law Schools.” Journal of Legal Education 2 (1949):
189–192.
———.Law and the Modern Mind. New York: Anchor Books, 1963.
———. “A Plea for Lawyer Schools.” Yale Law Journal 56 (1947): 1303–1344.
———. “Why Not a Clinical Lawyer-School?” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 81
(1933): 907–923.
Freitag, Jason. “Translating Nisi Per Legem Terrae: The Semiotics of Due Process.” LLM
thesis, Northwestern University, 1995.
Friedland, Steven. “How We Teach: A Survey of Teaching Techniques in American Law
Schools.”Seattle University Law Review 20 (1996): 1–44.
Friedman, Lawrence. A History of American Law. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1973.
Frohmann, Lisa. “Discrediting Victims’ Allegations of Sexual Assault.” Social Problems 38
(1991): 213–226.
Frug, Mary Joe. Postmodern Legal Feminism. New York: Routledge, 1992.
———. “Re-Reading Contracts: A Feminist Analysis of a Contracts Casebook.” American
University Law Review 34 (1985): 1065–1140.
Gal, Susan, and Judith T. Irvine. “The Boundaries of Languages and Disciplines: How
Ideologies Construct Difference.” Social Research 62 (1995): 967–1001.
Galanter, Marc. “Why the ‘Haves’ Come Out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal
Change.”Law & Society Review 9 (1974): 95–160.
Garner, David. “Socratic Misogyny? Analyzing Feminist Criticisms of Socratic Teach-
ing in Legal Education.” Brigham Young University Law Review 2000 (2000): 1597–
Garrett, Elizabeth. “Becoming Lawyers: The Role of the Socratic Method in Modern Law
Schools.”Green Bag 2d 1 (1998): 199–208.
Garrett, Paul, and Patricial Baquedano-Lopez. “Language Socialization: Reproduction and
Continuity, Transformation and Change.” Annual Review of Anthropology 31 (2002):
339–361.
Garrison, Marsha, Brian Tomko, and Ivan Yip. “Succeeding in Law School: A Compari-
son of Women’s Experiences at Brooklyn Law School and the University of Pennsyl-
vania.”Michigan Journal of Gender and Law 3 (1996): 515–550.
Garth, Bryant, and Yves Dezalay. The Internationalization of Palace Wars: Lawyers, Econo-
mists, and the Contest to Transform Latin American States. Chicago: University of
Chicago Press, 2002.
Garth, Bryant, and Joanne Martin. “Law Schools and the Construction of Competence.”
Journal of Legal Education 43 (1993): 469–510.
Garvin, P. J. A Prague School Reader on Esthetics, Literary Structure, and Style. Georgetown,
DC: Georgetown University School of Language, 1964.
Gee, E. G., and Donald Jackson. “Current Studies of Legal Education: Findings and Rec-
ommendations.”Journal of Legal Education 32 (1982): 471–505.