288 Bibliography
Gumperz, John. Discourse Strategies. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1982.
Gurin, Patricia, E. Dey, S. Hurtado, and G. Gurin. “Diversity and Higher Education: Theory
and Impact on Educational Outcomes.” Harvard Educational Review 72 (2002): 330–
366.
Hagan, John, and Fiona Kay. Gender in Practice: Lawyers’ Lives in Transition. New York:
Oxford University Press, 1997.
Hall, Roberta, and Bernice Sandler. The Classroom Climate: A Chilly One for Women?
Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges, Project on the Status and Edu-
cation of Women, 1982.
Hanks, William. Referential Practice: Language and Lived Space among the Maya. Chicago:
University of Chicago Press, 1990.
Hantzis, Catherine. “Kingsfield and Kennedy: Reappraising the Male Model of Law School
Teaching.”Journal of Legal Education 38 (1988): 155–164.
Harno, Albert. Legal Education in the United States. San Francisco: Bancroft-Whitney, 1953.
Harris, Angela. “Race and Essentialism in Feminist Legal Theory.” Stanford Law Review
42 (1990): 581–616.
Hawkins-León, Cynthia. “The Socratic Method–Problem Method Dichotomy: The De-
bate over Teaching Method Continues.” Brigham Young University Education & Law
Journal 1998 (1998): 1–18.
Heath, Shirley Brice. “Toward an Ethnohistory of Writing in American Education.” In
Writing: The Nature, Development, and Teaching of Written Communication, ed. Marcia
F. Whiteman, 25–46. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1982.
———.Ways with Words: Language, Life, and Work in Communities and Classrooms. Cam-
bridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1983.
Heffernan, William. “Not Socrates, but Protagoras: The Sophistic Basis of Legal Educa-
tion.” Buffalo Law Review 29 (1980): 399–423.
Heinz, John, Kathleen Hull, and Ava Harter. “Lawyers and Their Discontents: Findings
from a Survey of the Chicago Bar.” Indiana Law Journal 74 (1999): 735–758.
Heller, Jack F., C. Richard Puff, and Carol J. Mills. “Assessment of the Chilly College Cli-
mate for Women.” Journal of Higher Education 56 (1985): 446–461.
Herrnstein Smith, Barbara. “Narrative Versions, Narrative Theories.” Critical Inquiry 7
(1980): 213–236.
Higgins, Tracy. “Anti-Essentialism, Relativism, and Human Rights.” Harvard Women’s Law
Journal 19 (1996): 89–126.
Hill, Jane, and Judith Irvine, eds. Responsibility and Evidence in Oral Discourse. Cambridge,
UK: Cambridge University Press, 1992.
Hirsch, Susan. “Making Culture Visible: Comments on Elizabeth Mertz’s ‘Teaching Law-
yers the Language of Law: Legal and Anthropological Translations.’ ” John Marshall
Law Review 34 (2000): 119–129.
———.Pronouncing and Persevering: Gender and the Discourses of Disputing in an African
Islamic Court. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998.
Hocker, William Cliff, and Maurice Foster. “The African-American Lawyer: A Demo-
graphic Profile.” National Bar Association Magazine 5 (April 1991): 20.
Holland, Dorothy C., and Margaret A. Eisenhart. Educated in Romance: Women, Achieve-
ment, and College Culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990.
Homer, Suzanne, and Lois Schwartz. “Admitted but Not Accepted: Outsiders Take an
Inside Look at Law School.” Berkeley Women’s Law Journal 5 (1990): 1–74.
Hopwood v. Texas, 78 F.3d 932 (5th Circuit 1996).
Hue-Pei Au, Kathryn, and Jana M. Mason. “Social Organizational Factors in Learning to Read:
The Balance of Rights Hypothesis.” Reading Research Quarterly 17 (1981): 115–152.