298 Bibliography
Starr, June, and Jane Collier, eds. History and Power in the Study of Law: New Directions in
Legal Anthropology. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1989.
Sternglaz, Sarah, and Shirley Lyberger-Ficek. “Sex Differences in Student-Teacher Inter-
actions in the College Classroom.” Sex Roles 3 (1977): 345–352.
Stevens, Robert. Law School: Legal Education in America from the 1850s to the 1980s. Chapel
Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1983.
Stone, Alan. “Legal Education on the Couch.” Harvard Law Review 85 (1971): 392–442.
Stover, Robert V. Making It and Breaking It: The Fate of Public Interest Commitment Dur-
ing Law School. Ed. Howard Erlanger. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1989.
Street, Brian. Literacy in Theory and Practice. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1984.
Stropus, Ruta. “Mend It, Bend It, Extend It: The Fate of Traditional Law School Method-
ology in the 21st Century.” Loyola University-Chicago Law Journal 27 (1996): 449–489.
Sunstein, Cass. Legal Reasoning and Political Conflict. Oxford: Oxford University Press,
1996.
Taber, Janet, Marguerite Grant, Mary Huser, Rise Norman, James Sutton, Clarence Wong,
Louise Parker, and Claire Picard. “Gender, Legal Education, and the Legal Profes-
sion: An Empirical Study of Stanford Law Students and Graduates.” Stanford Law
Review 40 (1988): 1209–1297.
Tannen, Deborah. “Repetition in Conversation: Towards a Poetics of Talk.” Language 63
(1987): 574–605.
———. “Waiting for the Mouse: Constructed Dialogue in Conversation.” In The Dialogic
Emergence of Culture, ed. D. Tedlock and B. Mannheim, 198–217. Urbana: Univer-
sity of Illinois Press, 1995.
Teich, Paul. “Research on American Law Teaching: Is There a Case against the Case Sys-
tem?”Journal of Legal Education 36 (1986): 167–188.
Teitelbaum, Lee, Antoinette Sedillo Lopez, and Jeffrey Jenkins. “Gender, Legal Education,
and Legal Careers.” Journal of Legal Education 41 (1991): 443–481.
Tharp, Roland. “Psychocultural Variables and Constants: Effects on Teaching and Learn-
ing in Schools.” American Psychologist 44 (1989): 349–359.
Torres, Arturo Lopez, and Mary Kay Lundwall. “Moving beyond Langdell II: An Anno-
tated Bibliography of Current Methods for Law Teaching.” Gonzaga Law Review 35
(2000): 1–61.
Toulmin, Stephen. The Uses of Argument. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press,
1958.
Travers, Max. “Understanding Talk in Legal Settings: What Law and Society Studies Can
Learn from a Conversation Analyst.” Law & Social Inquiry 31 (forthcoming).
Trubek, Louise. “Crossing Boundaries: Legal Education and the Challenge of a ‘New Pub-
lic Interest’ Law.” Wisconsin Law Review 2005 (2005): 455–477.
Trujillo, Carla M. “A Comparative Examination of Classroom Interactions between Pro-
fessors and Minority and Non-Minority College Students.” American Educational
Research Journal 23 (1986): 629.
Tucker, Marilyn, Laurie Albright, and Patricia Busk. “Whatever Happened to the Class of
1983?”Georgetown Law Journal 78 (1989): 153–195.
Turner, Victor. Dramas, Fields, and Metaphors: Symbolic Action in Human Society. Ithaca,
NY: Cornell University Press, 1974.
Turow, Scott. One L. New York: Penguin, 1977.
Unger, Roberto. Law in Modern Society. New York: Free Press, 1976.
Van Gennep, Arnold. The Rites of Passage. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1960.
Vitiello, Michael. “Professor Kingsfield: The Most Misunderstood Character in Literature.”
Hofstra Law Review 33 (2005): 955–1015.