various forms of rationality. He associates the concept of strategy with the
following general categories of social action:
.Instrumental-rational, which refers to the means needed to achieve utilitarian
ends (reXecting material interests and the will to power). Weber ( 1946 ) labels
this ‘Zweckrationalita ̈t’.
.Value-rational, which refers to ethical, aesthetic, religious, political, or other
ideals (involving identiWcation and commitment). Weber ( 1946 ) labels this
‘Wertrationalita ̈t’.
.AVectual/emotional, which refers to the actor’s speciWcaVects and feelings
(sentiments and emotions can enhance value-rational commitments).
.Traditional, which refers to ingrained habits (the institutionalization of pre-
vious strategic decisions of either a utilitarian or idealistic character).
In theWeld of HRM, these four kinds of social action are particularly relevant
in shaping HR practices. From an economic and managerial perspective, it is usual
for only the instrumental-rational perspective to be taken into account. However,
especially when decisions relate to the shaping of employment relationships,
other categories of social action, based on values, emotions, and traditions, are
at stake. Kochan et al. ( 1986 ) also attach importance to the role of values, which stem
from diVerent rationalities, the role of history, and processes of institutionalization.
The framework presented in Fig. 9. 1 summarizes their approach.
This brings us into the realm of new institutionalism, a strand of theorizing
which gives us a sound basis for the inclusion of context in the study of HRM and a
way to explore the societal embeddedness of HR practices.
External environment
Values
Business
strategies Instiutional structureof firm-level industrial
relations Performance
outcomes
Employers
Workers
Labor unions
Society
Strategic activities
Collective bargaining/
personnel functional
activities
History and Workplace activities
current
structures
Labor markets
Workforce
characteristics
and values
Product markets
Technology
Public policies
Fig. 9.1. General framework for analyzing industrial relations issues
Source:Kochan et al. 1986.
172 jaap paauwe and paul boselie