QuantumPhysics.dvi
wang
(Wang)
#1
where
T^0 =
∑^3
k=1
Tkk
Tk^1 =
∑^3
i,j=1
1
2
εkijTij
Tij^2 =
1
2
Tij+
1
2
Tji−
1
3
δijT^0 (9.79)
The componentT^0 is a scalar and transforms in thej = 0 representation of the rotation
algebra;Ti^1 is a vector observable and transforms in thej= 1 representation of the rotation
algebra. Finally, the symmetric traceless tensorTij^2 has 5 linearly independent components
T++^2 ,T+0^2 ,T+^2 −−T 002 ,T 02 −,T−−^2 , and form an irreducible representationj= 2.
The Wigner-Eckardt theorem may be generalized to tensor observables. Let us illustrate
this by discussion point (2) of this theorem. Since we have
〈j′,m′,α′|Uk|j′′,m′′,α′′〉= 0 |j′−j′′|≥ 2
〈j′′,m′′,α′′|Vℓ|j,m,α〉= 0 |j−j′′|≥ 2 (9.80)
it follows that
〈j′,m′,α′|Tkℓ|j,m,α〉= 0 |j′−j|≥ 3 (9.81)
This result follows by inserting the identity betweenUkandVℓand representing the identity
by the completeness relationI=
∑
j′′,m′′,α′′|j
′′,m′′,α′′〉〈j′′,m′′,α′′|.
9.11 P,C, andT
The operations of reversal of space,P, reversal of time,T, and reversal of charges,C, are
discrete transformations which are all symmetries of quantum electrodynamics (QED), but
not necessarily of the other interactions. It is a very general result that, in any quantum
theory invariant under special relativity (as QED and the StandardModel of Particle Physics
are), the combined transformationCPT is a symmetry. This result is often referred to as
theCPTtheorem, and goes back to Pauli, who gave a first proof of the theorem. Of course,
it is ultimately an experimental question as to whetherCPT is a symmetry of Nature, and
so far, no violations have been observed.
Parity is a symmetry of the strong interactions, but is violated (“maximally”) by the
weak interactions. The combined operationCP (equivalent to T in a theory withCPT
invariance) is also violated by the weak interactions. CP also appears to be a symmetry