Mathematical Methods for Physics and Engineering : A Comprehensive Guide

(Darren Dugan) #1

29.3 EQUIVALENT REPRESENTATIONS


respect to a new basis vectoruQ; this supports our contention that representa-


tions connected by similarity transformations should be considered as thesame


representation.


For the four-element Abelian group consisting of the set{ 1 ,i,− 1 ,−i}under ordinary
multiplication, discussed near the end of section 29.2, change the basis vector fromu=
(1 i)TtouQ=(3−i 2 i−5)T. Find the real transformation matrixQ. Show that the
transformed representative matrix for elementi,DQT(i),isgivenby

DQT(i)=

(


17 − 29


10 − 17


)


and verify thatDTQT(i)uQ=iuQ.

Firstly, we solve the matrix equation


(


3 −i
2 i− 5

)


=


(


ab
cd

)(


1


i

)


,


witha, b, c, dreal. This givesQand henceQ−^1 as


Q=


(


3 − 1


− 52


)


, Q−^1 =


(


21


53


)


.


Following (29.7) we now find the transpose ofDQT(i)as


QDT(i)Q−^1 =

(


3 − 1


− 52


)(


01


− 10


)(


21


53


)


=


(


17 10


− 29 − 17


)


and henceDQT(i) is as stated. Finally,


DTQT(i)uQ=

(


17 10


− 29 − 17


)(


3 −i
2 i− 5

)


=


(


1+3i
− 2 − 5 i

)


=i

(


3 −i
2 i− 5

)


=iuQ,

as required.


Although we will not prove it, it can be shown that any finite representation

of a finite group of linear transformations that preserve spatial length (or, in


quantum mechanics, preserve the magnitude of a wavefunction) is equivalent to

Free download pdf