25.4 SUMMATION OF SERIES
By considering
∮Cπcotπz
(a+z)^2dz,whereais not an integer andCis a circle of large radius, evaluate
∑∞n=−∞1
(a+n)^2.
The integrand has (i) simple poles atz= integern,for−∞<n<∞, due to the factor
cotπzand (ii) a double pole atz=−a.
(i) To find the residue of cotπz, putz=n+ξfor smallξ:
cotπz=cos(nπ+ξπ)
sin(nπ+ξπ)≈
cosnπ
(cosnπ)ξπ=
1
ξπ.
The residue of the integrand atz=nis thusπ(a+n)−^2 π−^1.
(ii) Puttingz=−a+ξfor smallξand determining the coefficient ofξ−^1 gives§
πcotπz
(a+z)^2=
π
ξ^2cot(−aπ+ξπ)=
π
ξ^2{
cot(−aπ)+ξ[
d
dz(cotπz)]
z=−a+···
}
,
so that the residue at the double polez=−ais given by
π[−πcosec^2 πz]z=−a=−π^2 cosec^2 πa.Collecting together these results to express the residue theorem givesI=
∮
Cπcotπz
(a+z)^2dz=2πi[ N
∑
n=−N1
(a+n)^2−π^2 cosec^2 πa]
, (25.23)
whereNequals the integer part ofR. But as the radiusRofCtends to∞,cotπz→∓i
(depending on whether Imzis greater or less than zero, respectively). Thus
I<k∫
dz
(a+z)^2,
which tends to 0 asR→∞. ThusI→0asR(and henceN)→∞, and (25.23) establishes
the result
∑∞n=−∞1
(a+n)^2=
π^2
sin^2 πa.
Series with alternating signs in the terms, i.e. (−1)n, can also be attemptedin this way but using cosecπzrather than cotπz, since the former has residue
(−1)nπ−^1 atz=n(see exercise 25.11).
§This again illustrates one of the techniques for determining residues.