D’Arms, John. 1998. “Press Conference Announcing Major Foundation
Grants.” New York: American Council of Learned Societies. February 5.
Daston, Lorraine, and Peter Galison. 2007.Objectivity.Cambridge: Zone Books.
Davis, Murray. 1971. “That’s Interesting! Toward a Phenomenology of Soci-
ology and a Sociology of Phenomenology.”Philosophy of the Social Sci-
ences1:309–344.
Debray, Regis. 1979.Le pouvoir intellectual en France.Paris: Ramsay.
DeVault, Marjorie L. 1999.Liberating Methods: Feminism and Social Research.
Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Dewey, John. 1985.How We Think: A Restatement of the Relation of Reflective
Thinking to the Educative Process.Mineola, N.Y.: Dover Publications.
(Orig. pub. 1933.)
Dews, C. L. Barney, and Carolyn Leste Law. 1995.This Fine Place So Far from
Home: Voices of Academics from the Working Class.Philadelphia: Temple
University Press.
DiMaggio, Paul. 1997. “Culture and Cognition.”Annual Review of Sociology
23:263–287.
Dobbin, Frank. 1994.Forging Industrial Policy: The United States, Britain, and
France in the Railway Age.New York: Cambridge University Press.
———. 2009.Inventing Equal Opportunity.Princeton: Princeton University
Press.
Dubet, François. 2005. “Propositions pour une syntaxe des sentiments de
justice dans l’experience du travail.”Revue française de sociologie46 (3):
495–528.
———. 2006.Injustices: L’experiences des inegalites au travail.Paris: Seuil.
Duell, Jason. 2000. “Assessing the Literary: Intellectual Boundaries in French
and American Literary Studies.” Pp. 94–126 inRethinking Comparative
Cultural Sociology: Repertoires of Evaluation in France and the United
States,ed. Michèle Lamont and Laurent Thevenot. New York: Cam-
bridge University Press.
Durkheim, Emile. 1965.The Elementary Forms of Religious Life.New York:
Free Press.
Edelman, Lauren B., Sally Riggs Fuller, and Iona Mara-Drita. 2001. “Diversity
Rhetoric and the Managerialization of Law.”American Journal of Sociol-
ogy106 (6): 1589–1641.
Eisenhart, Margaret. 2002. “The Paradox of Peer Review: Admitting Too
Much or Allowing Too Little?”Research in Science Education32 (2):
241–255.
296 / References