How Professors Think: Inside the Curious World of Academic Judgment

(nextflipdebug5) #1

Lenoir, Timothy. 1993. “Discipline of Nature and the Nature of Disciplines.”
Pp. 77–78 inKnowledges: Historical and Critical Studies in Disciplinarity,
ed. Ellen Messer-Davidow, David Shumway, and David Sylvan. Char-
lottesville: University of Virginia Press.
Lévi-Strauss, Claude. 1983.Structural Anthropology.Trans. Monique Layton.
Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Levinson, Jerold. 2002. “Hume’s Standards of Taste: The Real Problem.”Jour-
nal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism60 (3): 227–238.
Lewis, Lionel. 1998.Scaling the Ivory Tower: Merit and Its Limits in Academic
Careers.New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction.
Liebert, Roland. 1976.Disintegration and Political Action: The Changing
Functions of City Governments in America.New York: Academic
Press.
———. 1982. “Productivity, Favor, and Grants among Scholars.”American
Journal of Sociology83 (3): 664–673.
Lipset, Seymour M. 1979.The First New Nation.New York: Norton. (Orig.
pub. 1963.)
Longino, Helen E. 2002.The Fate of Knowledge.Princeton: Princeton Univer-
sity Press.
Lukes, Steven. 1974.Power: A Radical View.London: Macmillan.
Lustick, Ian. 1997. “The Disciplines of Political Science: Studying the Culture
of Rational Choice as a Case in Point.”PS—Political Science and Politics
30 (2): 175–179.
Lynch, Michael. 1993.Scientific Practice and Ordinary Action: Ethno-
methodology and Social Studies of Science.New York: Cambridge Univer-
sity Press.
MacKenzie, Donald, and Yuval Millo. 2003. “Constructing a Market, Per-
forming Theory: The Historical Sociology of a Financial Derivatives Ex-
change.”American Journal of Sociology109 (10): 1907–1945.
Mallard, Grégoire. 2005. “Interpreters of the Literary Canon and Their Tech-
nical Instruments: The Case of Balzac Criticism.”American Sociological
Review70 (6): 992–1010.
Mallard, Grégoire, Michèle Lamont, and Joshua Guetzkow. 2007. “Cognitive
Contextualization, Epistemological Styles, and Peer Review in the Social
Sciences and the Humanities.” Cambridge: Harvard University, Depart-
ment of Sociology.
———. 2009. “Fairness as Appropriateness: Negotiating Epistemological
Differences in Peer Review.”Science, Technology and Human Values.


References / 307
Free download pdf