How Professors Think: Inside the Curious World of Academic Judgment

(nextflipdebug5) #1

Messer-Davidow, Ellen. 2002.Disciplining Feminism: From Social Activism to
Activist Discourse.Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.
Meyer, John. 1986. “Myths of Socialization and of Personality.” Pp. 208–221
inReconstructing Individualism: Autonomy, Individuality, and the Self in
Western Thought,ed. Thomas C. Heller, Morton Sosan, David E.
Welbery, Arnold I. Davidson, Ann Swidler, and Ian Watt. Stanford: Stan-
ford University Press.
Meyer, John, Francisco Ramirez, David John Frank, and Evan Schofer. 2006.
“Higher Education as an Institution.” Stanford: Center on Democracy,
Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies, Stanford University.
Meyer, John, and Brian Rowan. 1977. “Institutionalized Organizations: For-
mal Structure as Myth and Ceremony.”American Journal of Sociology 83
(2): 340–363.
Miles, Matthew B., and A. Michael Huberman. 1994.Qualitative Data Analy-
sis: A Sourcebook of New Methods.Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage.
Moser, Walter. 2001. “Posface: Pas d’euphorie! anatomie d’une crise.”Cana-
dian Review of Comparative Literature26 (3–4): 193–210.
Mukerji, Chandra. 2007. “Cultural Genealogy: Method for a Historical Soci-
ology of Culture or Cultural Sociology of History.”Cultural Sociology 1
(1): 49–71.
Mulkay, Michael. 1976. “Norms and Ideology in Science.”Social Science In-
formation15:627–656.
———. 1991.Sociology of Science: A Sociological Pilgrimage.Philadelphia:
Open University Press.
Munch, Peter A. 1975. “‘Sense’ and ‘Intention’ in Max Weber’s Theory of So-
cial Action.”Sociological Inquiry45 (4): 59–65.
Musselin, Christine. 1996. “Les marchés du travail universitaires, comme
économie de la qualité.”Revue Française de Sociologie37 (2): 189–208.
———. 2005.Le marché des universitaires: France, Allemagne, Etats-Unis.
Paris: Presses de SciencesPo.
Nagel, Ernest. 1961.The Structure of Science: Problems in the Logic of
Scientific Explanation.New York: Harcourt, Brace.
National Academy of Sciences. 2006. “Beyond Bias and Barriers: Fulfilling
the Potential of Women in Academic Science and Engineering.” Report
prepared for the National Academies, Washington, D.C.
National Opinion Research Center. 2006.Survey of Earned Doctorates, 2005.
Arlington, Va.: National Science Foundation.


References / 309
Free download pdf