12 Leaders TheEconomistNovember6th 2021
so, shamelessly, bringing Parliament into disrepute.
This tawdry episode adds to a pattern set by thegovernment
of Boris Johnson. Having strode victorious into DowningStreet
as one of the architects of Brexit, the prime ministerbehavesas
if laws are for other people. Lord Frost, the government’sBrexit
negotiator, is demanding that the eu rewrite aspectsofthewith
drawal treaty relating to Northern Ireland that Britainsignedup
to in a push to get Brexit done (see Charlemagne).InSeptember
2020 Sir Jonathan Jones, the head of the governmentlegalser
vice, advised that the government’s plan to overridepartsofthe
Brexit withdrawal deal would break internationallaw.MrJohn
son ignored his advice, so Sir Jonathan felt obligedtoresign.
The prime minister is also seeking to undermineBritain’s
precarious system of checks and balances. Whenofficialsre
sponsible for holding ministers to account have triedtodotheir
job, they are made to suffer. Two months after SirJonathanquit,
an independent adviser on the ministerial codereportedthat
Priti Patel, the home secretary, had bullied underlings.WhenMr
Johnson said he would ignore that report, too, theofficialfol
lowed Sir Jonathan out of the door.
The government is neutering independent bodiessupposed
to hold it to account. It wants to put the ElectoralCommission,a
watchdog, under the thumb of a Conservativedominatedcom
mittee of mps, and to strip it of the power to initiatecriminal
prosecutions. It is trying to parachute in Paul Dacre,a former
editor of the Daily Mail, a tubthumping Brexiteerandallroundscourgeofliberals,asthebossofOfcom,themediaregulator,
eventhoughtheappointmentpanelconcludedthathislackof
impartialitymadehim“unappointable”.Thempwholeadsthe
parliamentarycommitteeconcernedwithcultureandthemedia
hassaidpubliclythat,inchoosingitsnextpoliticaleditor,the
bbcshouldpicka Brexiteer.
Thegovernmentisalsotryingtotamethecourts.Itwantsto
tightenrulesgoverningjudicial reviewofpublicbodies’de
cisions.Anegregiousproposalbythejusticesecretary,Dominic
Raab,wouldmakeiteasierandquickertochangecourtrulings
thatitdeemstobewrong(seeBritainsection).Ratherthande
fendingjudicialindependence,theattorneygeneral,SuellaBra
verman,hasjoinedtheattack,implyingthatinsomecasesrelat
edtoBrexitproEuropeansentimentmeantjudgeshadentered
thepoliticalarena.
Aswewritethis,thegovernmentwasstartingtohavesecond
thoughtsaboutMrPaterson.Aftera furiousbacklashandoppo
sitionthreatstoboycottthenewcommittee,itpledgedtoseek
crosspartysupportforchangestothesystem.Itisnottoolate
forMrJohnsontolearnthemoralfromthissleazyaffair.Brit
ain’sconstitutiongrants theexecutivegreatlatitude.Having
broughtBritainoutoftheeuagainstthewishesofthe“liberal
elite”—bywhichtheymeaneveryonefromjudgestojournal
ists—Brexiteersseethemselvesasbeholdentonoone.Ifthe
governmentcontinuestoactasifrulesareforlosers,itwill
bringdemocracyitselfintodisrepute.nA
las, the cop26summit in Glasgow is shapinguptobea dis
appointment. The hope that emerging markets,whichbelch
out much of the world’s greenhouse gases, wouldannounceam
bitious proposals is being dashed. The plans of China,Indiaand
Brazil all underwhelm. There is no sign this willbethecopthat
kills coal, as Britain, the host, wanted. World leadershavestill
not agreed to stop subsidising fossil fuels.
But one area where enthusiasm is growing is climatefinance.
Financial institutions representing nearly $9trn in assets
pledged to uproot deforestation from their in
vestment portfolios (see International section).
The most striking announcement has come
from the Glasgow Financial Alliance for Net Ze
ro (gfanz), a coalition cochaired by Mark Car
ney, a former governor of the Bank of England.
Its members, which include asset owners, asset
managers, banks and insurers, hold about
$130trn of assets. They will try to cut the emis
sions from their lending and investing to net zero by 2050. Can
the financial industry really save the world?
In principle, it has a huge role to play. Shifting the economy
from fossil fuels to clean sources of energy requires a vast reallo
cation of capital. By 2030, around $4trn of investment in clean
energy will be needed each year, a tripling of current levels.
Spending on fossil fuels must decline. In an ideal world the pro
fit incentive of institutional investors would be aligned with re
ducing emissions, and these owners and financiers would controltheglobalassetsthatcreateemissions.Assetownerswould
haveboththemotiveandthemeanstoreinventtheeconomy.
Therealityofgreeninvestingfallsshortofthisideal.Thefirst
problemiscoverage.TheEconomistestimatesthatlistedfirms
whicharenotstatecontrolledaccountforonly1432%ofthe
world’semissions.Statecontrolledcompanies,suchasCoalIn
diaorSaudiAramco,theworld’sbiggestoilproducer,area big
partoftheproblemandtheydonotoperateundertheswayofin
stitutionalfundmanagersandprivatesectorbankers.
Asecondissueismeasurement.Thereisas
yetnowaytoaccuratelyassessthecarbonfoot
printofaportfoliowithoutdoublecounting.
Emissionsfroma barrelofoilcouldappearin
thecarbonaccountsofthefirmsthataredrill
ing,refiningandburningthestuff.Methodolo
giesbehindattributingemissionstofinancial
flowsare even sketchier.Howshouldshare
holders, lenders and insurers divvy up the
emissions from a coalfired power plant, for instance?
The third problem is incentives. Private financial firms aim
to maximise riskadjusted profits for their clients and owners.
This is not wellaligned with cutting carbon. The easiest way to
cut the carbon footprint of a diversified portfolio is to sell the
part of it invested in dirty assets and put the proceeds in firms
that never emitted much, such as, say, Facebook. Together, the
five biggest American tech firms have a carbon intensity (emis
sions per unit of sales) of about 3% of the s&p500 average.Why the net-zeropledgesoffinancialfirmswon’tsavetheworldFinancial firms with
net-zero targets, global totalNov 2021Apr 2021Nov 2020 3016040+The uses and abuses of green finance
Climate change and investing