4 SpecialreportStabilisingtheclimate TheEconomistOctober30th 2021
sheetsofGreenlandandwesternAntarcticaandmakingiteasier
formidsizedhurricanestointensifyintothemostpowerfulof
storms.Itisalsomakingitharderfornutrientsatdepthtogetto
thelivingthingsthatdependonthemclosetothesurfaceandre
ducingoxygenlevels.Sealevelsarerisingbya centimetreevery
threeyearsorso.
Ifthiswerea continentalrearrangement,itwouldbea global
tectonicspasmwhichmovedallthecontinentsandtheirhapless
inhabitantsawayfromthepolesandtowardstheequatorwhile,at
thesametime,pushingoncecoolmountainheightsdownto
wardsswelteringplainsandoncestablecoastlinesbeneaththe
waves.Andit wouldbepickingupspeed.
ThereisnodoubtthatthechangeintheCO 2 levelwasbrought
aboutbyhumankind—mainlythroughtheburningoffossilfuels,
butalsothroughconversionofforestsandothernaturalecosys
temstofarmland.Aslongasthoseactivitiescontinueintheircur
rentform,theCO 2 levelwillcontinuetorise,andtheworldwill
movefurtherandmoredamaginglyawayfromitshistoricalstate.
In1992,whentheCO 2 levelhadreached356ppm andevidence
ofanthropogenicwarmingwas,ifnotoverwhelming,definitely
discernible,theleadersoftheworldagreedtodosomethingabout
thepotentiallycatastrophiccoursetheyhadmoreorlessunwit
tinglyembarkedon.IntheunFrameworkConventiononClimate
Change(unfccc) agreeduponata summitinRiodeJaneirothat
year,theycommittedthemselvestothe“stabilisationofgreen
housegasconcentrationsintheatmosphereata levelthatwould
preventdangerousanthropogenicinterferencewiththeclimate
system”.Thiswastobedoneina “timeframesufficienttoallow
ecosystemstoadaptnaturallytoclimatechange,toensurethat
foodproductionisnotthreatenedandtoenableeconomicdevel
opmenttoproceedina sustainablemanner”.
Thiswas,byfar,themostambitiousinternationalagreement
ofalltime.Thereisnowayofstabilisingtheclimatewithoutstop
pingtheincreaseinthelevelsoflonglivedgreenhousegasesin
theatmosphere.Althoughit didnotsaysoinsomanywords—ma
nymightnothavesignedupifithad—theunfccchad,ineffect,
committeditssignatoriestoendingthefossilfuelage.
Anewera
Fossil fuels have been crucial to the development of the economy
for two centuries. They played an intimate part in the most impor
tant transformation in the human condition since the develop
ment of agriculture, a transformation that saw a huge growth both
in the world’s population and in people’s wealth. But their use also
gave the CO 2 level, previously part of the background against
which the human drama played out, a potentially showstealing,
orevenshowending,role.Ithadtobebroughtundercontrol.It
hadtobestabilised.
Whiletheseremarkableaspirationsfloatedfreeofspecifictar
gets,thesheermagnitudeofthetaskcouldbeignored,andig
noreditlargelywas.In 2015 inParis,thesamegroupofcountries
tetheredtheiraspirationstoa setofspecificgoals,therebyreveal
ingthebrutalsizeoftheundertaking.“Preventingdangerousan
thropogenicchange”,saidtheParisagreement,meantinpractice,
“holdingtheincreaseintheglobalaveragetemperaturetowellbe
low2°Cabovepreindustriallevelsandpursuingeffortstolimit
thetemperatureincreaseto1.5°Cabovepreindustriallevels”.As
tothetimeframe,thepeakingreenhousegasemissionsshould
comeabout“assoonaspossible”,thereshouldbe“rapidreduc
tionsthereafter”,and“abalancebetweenanthropogenicemis
sionsbysourcesandremovalsbysinksofgreenhousegases”(net
zeroemissions)shouldbeachievedby“thesecondhalfofthis
century”—ie,inconsiderablylessthana humanlifespan.
AsthepartiestotheunfcccconvergeonGlasgowforthecop
26 summit, this special report looks at what those commitments
mean. It is not a guide to the specifics of carboncutting policies
and technologies, nor to the particular ways in which national
commitments made in Glasgow will fall short of the ambition
needed. It is a survey of the scale of action required, the battle
ground on which it will be fought and the fundamental novelty of
undertaking to stabilise the climate.
The moment when the CO 2 level, so flat for so long, began to
rise was the inadvertent beginning of a new era in which the in
dustrial economy and the forces of nature became conjoined. The
moment when the now perilously steep curve rounds the corner
to a new plateau, or even a steady decline, will be as consequential.
But the agreements in Rio and Paris say that this time it will not be
inadvertent. The curveflattening climate stabilisation will be the
result of deliberate interventions in both the economy and nature
on a global scale. And it will be maintained, if itismaintained, by
human institutions with the astonishing, andpossibly hubristic,
mandate of longterm atmospheric management.n
The great right angle
Global atmospheric CO2 concentration, parts per million
Sources:OurWorldinData; NOAA
4000 2000
450
400
350
300
250
150010005001500100015002000250030003500
Pre-industrial range
BC AD
State of play
The Paris challenge
T
hatit tookalmost a quarter of a century of diplomatic wran
gling, setbacks and innovation for the world to put Paris’s
numbers and procedures to Rio’s remarkable ambition makes it
unsurprising that, as yet, little has been done to meet its goals. In
1992, according to figures from Our World in Data, 78% of the
world’s primary energy—the stuff used to produce electricity,
drive movement and provide heat both for industrial purposes
and to warm buildings—came from fossil fuels. By 2019 the total
amount of primary energy used had risen by 60%. And the propor
tion provided by fossil fuels was now 79%.
Over the same period the share of primary energy provided as
electricity by modern renewables—wind turbines and solar pan
els—rose from nothing to 3%. The share provided by nuclear pow
er, which is also generated without fossil fuels, fell from 5.4% to
4%. Hydroelectricity was more or less stable at 6%.
Luckily, not all trends are linear. The highly subsidised growth
in renewables that began to take off in the early 2000s has not yet
Replacing fossil fuels is becoming easier. But temperatures
are still likely to rise too far