164 Mathematics for Finance
Proof
We employ put-call parity (7.1):
CE(S′′)−PE(S′′)=S′′−Xe−rT,
CE(S′)−PE(S′)=S′−Xe−rT.
Subtracting, we get
(CE(S′′)−CE(S′)) + (PE(S′)−PE(S′′)) =S′′−S′.
Both terms on the left-hand side are non-negative by the previous theorem, so
each is strictly less than the right-hand side.
Remark 7.5
A consequence of Proposition 7.10 is that the slope of the straight line joining
two points on the graph of the call or put price as a function ofSis less than 45◦.
This is illustrated in Figure 7.7 for call options. In other words, the call and
Figure 7.7 Lipschitz property of call pricesCE(S)
put pricesCE(S)andPE(S) satisfy the Lipschitz condition with constant 1,
∣∣
CE(S′′)−CE(S′)
∣∣
≤|S′′−S′|,
∣∣
PE(S′′)−PE(S′)
∣∣
≤|S′′−S′|.
Proposition 7.11
LetS′<S′′and letα∈(0,1). Then
CE(αS′+(1−α)S′′)≤αCE(S′)+(1−α)CE(S′′),
PE(αS′+(1−α)S′′)≤αPE(S′)+(1−α)PE(S′′).
This means that the call and put prices are convex functions ofS.