PHYSICS PROBLEM SOLVING

(Martin Jones) #1

(^) Dialog Code Comments



  1. GS W 5. MP This would be te'll need one onension. “a” one on “w” C New Episode
    and w 7. SK We do?e'll need a f [ Eachorce diag lookrams at their ow for the knot. n W W = need for a force diagram^
    paper.] RQCl RQCl =WarranAsks for clarift. Request foicatior Clan of thrifice ation.

  2. GS I think so, does that make sense? RQCl Sp Supports his own warrant.

  3. SK Um 10. MP Whm at'd you say? RQCl Ak Ak = A cknowledgment.
    knot th 11. GS Tere. [poinhat wts to pictue'd need a diagre] ram for the Cl Clarifies 8.

  4. SK Do we? [pause] RQSp SK is still uRequest for Sncertainupport. RQSp. =

  5. MPever doin I dong that...didn't, well do w't we just do it fe...I don't remor... ember B Incomplete thoughtsomething that was d refers to one in class.

  6. GS I'm assuming that the problem is (We = the class )
    wrong, but wwe've got...me've gaybe I'ot thm seeinis rog thpe here attache picture ed to
    the wthen attachall [points toed to th pictue bookre., o and wthers we're puatchllin] ang d
    that weight.


G withGrounds from the problem the pi statemcture sent. upplied


  1. SK So likacross here [looke ying at her oweah, this was likn copye s oftraig the ht
    problemgoes down. ], and then they put the weight on so it
    B^ The “book, the profthey” couessor, or sld refer to thomething e
    the Tprobl.A. diem. d in a previous

  2. GS Adown, tension tnd righat way and tensiht at the knot thon upere's ten that sion
    where wway ...it'e had ths like the pictue three wres he [i.e., Teights. Think of.A.] drew
    [Geswhat hturese [i.e., T towards.A.] just drew the board.] on the board.


W^
B^

(^) W = directions of the tensions
(^) B = What the T.A. did on the
blackboard.



  1. MP OK
    Table 4-18. Group 3A, Episode 2-3, Lines 5-17.
    The two groups that had dual argument patterns, 4B and 5B, both use Alternate Claims,
    but in slightly different ways. When Group 4B uses a Modified Claim preceding an Alternate
    Claim, there is additional elaboration in the form of Grounds, Warrants, and Backings.
    However, when there is no Modified Claim preceding an Alternate Claim, there are no additional
    Grounds, Warrants, and Backings. It seems as if the Modified Claim elicits the Grounds,

Free download pdf