general decrease of performance, compared to trading without the filter. In this case,
the profit factor comes out to 1.52, compared to 1.38 in Table 20.7, while, for exam-
ple, the risk–reward ratio is more than cut in half. The same goes for the trailing-stop
version of the same system, in Table 21.11. Although, in this case, given that a small
deterioration of performance because of the filter was expected, it’s almost fair to say
that the filter version of this system is doing better than its predecessor, in Table 20.8.
264 PART 3 Stops, Filters, and Exits
Volume-weighted average: 2.4 ATR trailing stop,
2 ATR profit target, 6 bars max. trade length PercProf: 69.57
Trades PercWin NetProfit AvgProfit ProfitStD RiskRatio
Average: 37.52 56.17 14,106.93 639.20 Market
St. Dev: 19.00 9.81 24,036.62 1,009.94 5,309.69 0.09
High: 56.52 65.97 38,143.55 1,649.15 5,948.89 Portfolio
Low: 18.52 46.36 (9,929.70) (370.74) (4,670.48) 0.63
ProfitFactor RiskFactor MaxDD PercDD PercTime AvgLength
Average: 1.36 0.12 25,606.39 20.93 7.49 6.18
St. Dev: 0.55 0.20 12,433.08 11.55 2.89 0.34
High: 1.91 0.32 38,039.47 32.48 10.38 6.53
Low: 0.80 (0.08) 13,173.31 9.38 4.60 5.84
TABLE 21.9
Volume-weighted System Using Relative-strength Bands as Filter
Meander system, V.1.0: 1.8 ATR stop loss,
3 ATR profit target, 8 bars max. trade length PercProf: 76.00
Trades PercWin NetProfit AvgProfit ProfitStD RiskRatio
Average: 94.20 52.95 61,158.69 848.19 Market
St. Dev: 36.77 6.27 66,828.26 1,112.10 6,144.18 0.11
High: 130.97 59.22 127,986.95 1,960.29 6,992.38 Portfolio
Low: 57.43 46.67 (5,669.58) (263.90) (5,295.99) 0.76
ProfitFactor RiskFactor MaxDD PercDD PercTime AvgLength
Average: 1.39 0.16 39,925.46 29.14 24.06 8.23
St. Dev: 0.44 0.18 18,362.82 16.54 4.66 0.53
High: 1.83 0.35 58,288.28 45.68 28.71 8.76
Low: 0.95 (0.02) 21,562.64 12.59 19.40 7.70
TABLE 21.8
Meander System Using Relative-strength Bands as Filter