PILLARS
57
aspect, as
Avalokit^shvara—
the
Lord who
looks down from
above.
The consecration
of
structural forms,
originally
derived
frompurelyutilitarian
uses,
throughthis
religious
idealismwas
obviouslythe
reasonwhy
theVedic rail
and the
sun-window
were retainedas
decorative motifs in
thetraditional
canonsof
theIndianbuilding
craftlongafter
theirstructural
significance
was lostsight of.
Theywere
ideographs of
anart-language
which, though incomprehensible
bythose
outside the
Indo-
Aryan
pale, was perfectly
understood
by the people
whose
religious sentiments
it expressed.
Wewill
nowsee howthis
religioussymbolism
alsodeter-
mined
the decorativetreatment
of another
essential structural
feature in Indian building
—the column,
pier, or pillar.
In
Asokanand
later Indian sculpturethereare
two kinds repre-
sented
: one isthedhwaja-stambha
(flag-pole), ortheIdt,
used
to mark sacred places,
to carry inscriptionsand
symbols,and
aslamp-standards
;
theotheristhe structuralform
appliedto
thesupport
ofbuildings, and subsequently,
as intheclassical
"
orders
"
of Europe,totheir
embellishment. The first kind
isrepresentedby
thesinglepillarsuponwhichAsokainscribed
his edicts,and
by the pairs which, like the Boaz and
Jachin
of the
Templeof Jerusalem, stood in front of
the entranceto
Buddhist and
Jain
sttipasandtemples. They
wereoriginally
thetribalensigns
orthestandardsofroyalty,whichwereplanted
outside
theentrance tothe sacrificialarea at the great horse-
sacrifices inVedictimes.
A
quaint sculpture at Bharhut (fig. b, PI. XII) shows a
female,
probably Sri, orLakhsmi, carryingVishnu'sstandard
surmountedby themythicalsun-bird Garuda.
The Buddhist,
Jain,
and Brahmanical temple-pillar also
derives its symbolic decorative treatment from the ancient
Aryan
sacrificial ritual in which gilded posts,
"
octagonal and