THE
SIVA SHRINE
105
The'
shrinesbehind
the
porchdiffer
in shape of
plan
:
in
theAjantimodel itiscircular,orofthe vesaratype,
according
to the
definition ofthe Silpa-sistras,"while Siva's shrine
is
square,
or of the nagara type. The base of the chaitya is
sculptured
in twostories,eachdividedbypilastersintoshrines
filled
with figures.
The two lower stories of Arjtlna's Rath
are
treated in exactly the
same way. A minor difference is
that
the
monasticcellsdonot continue all
round the chaitya
as
they do in ^e
shrine of
Siva,
and no
yogi cells are
shown
in the former.
Ar-
jtlna's Rath
isa nava-ratna
(nine-jewelled)
temple,orone
that
haseightyogi
cellswith
domes,
besides the
dome
which
covers the principal
cell containing
the sacred
image. But the
so-called
"
Dravidian
"
dome,
differs
onlyfromthe
northerndome
in showing
externally the
eieht
ribs used in
the con-
FlG.43-Plan
oftheIntemal
structureof
Ancient
O
.
, , ,
„
, ,
TainStflpa,showing
the"
Eight-petalledLotus.
struction of
both,' and
'by
havingoutward
curving
eavesadded
to
throwtherain
offthe
walls
of'the cell
(see fig.
37)-
The
dome
of the
chaitya is
crownedbythe
Vedic
altarand
tee
;
the
other,
when
completed,
would havehad
thewater-pot
finial
{kalashd).
Ther^
is then
not the
least
difference
between
the
two
shrines as
regards
"style."
Such
differences
as
there are
onlyarisefrom
structural
conditions—
that one
wasa
cubical
'
Seeabove,p.89.
.
- .
t
*a.,™
2
Fig.
43
showsthe
sftuctural
arrangement
ofthe
interior
ofanancientJain
stflpa
nearMathur^.