]i6 IMAGES
OF THE BUDDHA
the ideals of Indo-Aryan
art, itwas not
until theGandharan
master-masons had drunk
in the inspiration of Indo-Aryan
philosophy and religion that any of
their sculpture became
worthy of comparisonwith thebest
original artofIndia.
Indirectly, however, the inflow of this current
from
the
West greatlyassisted the
newmovement from within,which
wasalreadytending
towards
the
removal oftherestraintwhich
hadhindered thehigher
developmentofIndo-Aryan sculpture
andpaintingfromtheearliestVedictimes.
TheKushankings
wereevidentlyliberalpatronsofthefinearts,
and,likethe
Great
Moguls,were personally
interested
in
sculpture and painting.
Thoughofthe Buddhistfaith,theywereindifferenttotherule
oftheHinayanaschool,
whichforbade
anyiconofthe Master's
personality in the service ofthe Sangha. The elders of the
Buddhist ChurchinGandhara,anxioustoreconciletheirroyal
patrons'dilettantismwiththeritualistic
traditionsoftheircreed,
withdrewtheprohibition,butlaiddownstrictrules,inthespirit
of
Vedic
philosophy,topreventvulgaridolatry. The imageof
the Blessed
One
was
not to be fashioned, like those of the
Olympian
gods,asanidealhuman
;
norwasittobeworshipped
untilithadbeenconsecrated
withappropriaterites. Theimager
byspiritualinsight
mustrealisetheDivinitywhichtransfigured
Himwhen Heattained Nirvana
underthe BodhitreeatGayi:
hemusttransporthimselfby
meditationtotheTusitaheavens,
wheretheBuddhanowwatched
humanitywith compassionate
eyes, andshowthedivineglory
revealedtohimthere.
Thenaiveendeavoursofthe
unimaginativeWesterncrafts-
man to adapt his materialistic
art to theseunfamiliarmystic
ideas
are to be seen in the early
sculptures of the Gandhara
school. Theintellectual
atmosphereoftheKushancourt must
have
presented manyanalogies
tothatwhichexists
in
modern
India: there
were the similar
endeavours to
understand
the
Indian mind
de haut en bas,
the same aloofness
from it,
and