Foundations of Treatment 133
- Computer software can provide virtual reality exposure treatment, which can be
particularly helpful when it would be diffi cult to have a therapist along for an in
vivo exposure (such as on an airplane, for those with a fear of fl ying).
Researchers have found that 4 weeks of computer-assisted CBT treatment for
anxiety plus 8 weeks of self-monitoring with a hand-held device was as effective as
12 weeks of the usual CBT (Newman et al., 1997; Przeworski & Newman, 2004).
Cybertherapy
Therapy most frequently occurs when therapist and patient are together in the
same room, but technology has offered an alternative possibility—therapy at
a distance. One well-established use of technology (at the low-tech end of the
spectrum) is phone calls between therapists and patients for emergencies. For
patients who are not able to get to a therapist’s offi ce, because they live in a rural
area, are housebound with a medical illness, or because their phobias prevent a
face-to-face meeting with a therapist, therapy conducted over the telephone may
be better than no treatment (Ludman et al., 2007; Mohr, Hart, et al., 2005; Tate &
Zabinski, 2004).
Newer technology has made possible another form of treatment that allows
patient and therapist to be in different locations:cybertherapy, or Internet-based
therapy. In such therapy, the patient and the therapist interact online. Clinicians
have developed a number of different cybertherapeutic techniques (Santhiveeran &
Grant, 2005):
- E-therapy,or e-mail exchanges between patient and therapist.
Patient and therapist do not meet face to face. E-mail exchanges
can be valuable to both patient and therapist in providing a real-
time written record of the conversation (Murphy & Mitchell,
1998), and the task of organizing a thoughtful written commu-
nication itself can be therapeutic (Pennebaker, 1999);
- E-mail exchanges between patient and therapist who also meet
face-to-face. Such e-mails may include updates on between-
session homework assignments and questions or comments
raised by a prior session (Barnett & Scheetz, 2003; Ruwaard
et al., 2007).
- Real-time chat room involving a patient and a therapist.
- Real-time face-to face video chats (using webcams) between a
patient and a therapist (Jerome & Zaylor, 2000).
Leon, because of his anxiety about meeting new people, might
fi nd cybertherapy initially more comfortable than face-to-face therapy. However, most
therapists have reservations about using the Internet as a vehicle for therapy. Concerns
about various forms of cybertherapy include (Heinlen et al., 2003):
- Imposters. The individual posing as a therapist may be neither professionally
trained nor licensed.
Privacy•. With Internet or e-mail communications, confi dentiality and privacy can-
not be guaranteed (Young, 2005).
- Incomplete communication. E-mail communications lack important nonverbal
cues (such as body language, facial expressions, and tone of voice); a therapist in
face-to-face therapy sessions uses such information to assess a patient’s problems
and responses to treatment suggestions (Bloom, 1998). However, the use of web-
cams may reduce this concern.
Some studies have shown that treatment via cybertherapy is more effective
than none at all (Lange et al., 2001; Ritterband et al., 2003), but little research
so far has compared cybertherapy to in-person therapy (either in general or for
specifi c disorders). For instance, although e-mail has been used in family therapy
Cybertherapy
Internet-based therapy.
Cybertherapy can be particularly helpful for rural
or housebound patients, enabling them to meet
with a therapist.
AP Photo/Nati Harnik