Product
development
and testing
New
product
strategy
Idea
generation
Idea
screening
Concept
development
and testing
Business
analysis
Test
marketing Launch
New product development 315
Machines, mobile phones. And so they are, but
does that mean that they could not have failed?
What were the basic ideas? The Walkman:
portable, personal audio entertainment. The
laser printer: fast, accurate, flexible, high-qual-
ity reproduction. Automatic Teller Machines:
24-hour cash availability from machines. As
ideas, these might have been transformed into
products in numerous ways, perhaps less suc-
cessfully than the products we now find so
familiar and convenient.
Imagine the alternative forms for personal
audio entertainment: a bulkier headset which
contains the tape-playing mechanism and ear-
phones; a small hand-held player, complete
with carrying handle, attached to earphones
via a cord; a ‘backpack’ style player with
earphones. All of these ideas would have
delivered to the idea of ‘portable, personal
audio entertainment’, but which if any of
these would have enjoyed the same success as
the Walkman? And the Automatic Teller
Machines? These might have been developed
as stand-alone units, much like bottle banks,
requiring the identification of ideal locations,
planning permission and consumer confidence
to enter them. Would they have been as
widespread as the hole-in-the-wall? Finally,
the mobile phone: these might have developed
with any number of constraining factors,
including price, reach, size, weight and
functionality.
Think of another ‘good idea’ – the light-
weight, low-pollution, low-cost, easily-parked
town car. Now imagine one realization of the
idea: three-wheeled, battery-run (with 80 km
worth of charge only), and, for the British
weather, an optionalroof. This realization is, of
course, the widely-quoted failure, the C5. Yet
theidearemains a good one.
The issue at stake here is that good ideas
do not automatically translate into workable,
appealing products. The idea has to be given
a physical reality which performs the function
of the idea, which potential customers find an
attractive alternative for which they are pre-
pared to pay the asking price. This task
requires NPD to be managed actively, working
though a set of activities which ensure that the
eventual product is makeable, affordable, reli-
able and attractive to customers.
The activities carried out during the proc-
ess of developing new products are well sum-
marized in various NPD models. These are
templates or maps which can be used to
describe and guide those activities required to
bring a new product from an idea or opportu-
nity, through to a successful market launch.
NPD models take numerous forms.
One of the most recognized NPD models
is that developed by the consultants, Booz
Allen Hamilton (BAH, 1982) and this process
continues to be associated with successful
outcomes (Griffin, 1997; Tzokas, 2000). This
model is shown in Figure 12.1.
This model has been reformulated and
shaped over several decades, with the influen-
tial derivative from Cooper and Kleinschmidt
(1990) known as the Stage–Gate™ process
(Figure 12.2). In the US, the Best Practice
Study (1997) showed that 60 per cent of firms
used some form of Stage–Gate process, whilst
the study in the UK by Tzokas (2000) reported
only 8 per cent of firms not having some
specified form of process.
This and other developments of the BAH
model are considered later in the chapter;
below is a brief description of the tasks neces-
sary to complete the development and launch
of a new product. Each of the stages is
described below in turn.
Figure 12.1 The Booz Allen Hamilton model of new product development