——. 1963. “Sur le genre du su ̄ tra dans la litterature sanskrite,” Journal asiatique251:
165–216.
——. 1969. “Pa ̄n.ini,”Current Trends in Linguistics5: 481–98.
——. 1978. L’Inde fondamentale: Etudes d’indianisme réunies et présentées par Charles
Malamoud. Paris: Hermann.
—— and Filliozat, Jean. 1953. L’Inde classique: Manuel des études indiennes, vol. II, Paris:
Imprimerie Nationale/Hanoi: Ecole Française d’Extrême Orient.
Ruegg, D. S. 1959. Contributions à l’histoire de la philosophie linguistique indienne. Paris:
E. de Boccard.
Scharfe, Hartmut. 1977. Grammatical Literature. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.
Staal, Frits (ed.). 1972. A Reader on the Sanskrit Grammarians. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
——. 1988. Universals: Studies in Indian Logic and Linguistics. Chicago and London:
University of Chicago Press.
——. 1989. “The Independence of Rationality from Literacy,” European Journal of
Sociology30: 301–10.
——. 1989, 1993. Rules Without Meaning: Ritual, Mantras and the Human Sciences. New
York etc.: Peter Lang.
——. 1992. “Su ̄ tra,” in Vatsyayan, ed., 303–14.
——. 1993, 1994. Concepts of Science in Europe and Asia. Leiden: International Institute
of Asian Studies.
——. 1995. “The Sanskrit of Science,” Journal of Indian Philosophy23: 73–127.
——. 2000. “Vya ̄ karan.a and S ́ulba in the Light of Newton’s Lesson,” in R. Tsuchida and
A. Wezler, eds.,Volume in Honour of Professor Minoru Hara. Reinbek.
Surya Kanta. 1968. Atharvapra ̄tis ́a ̄khya. Delhi: Mehar Chand Lachman Das.
——. 1970. R.ktantra. Delhi: Mehar Chand Lachman Das.
Thieme, Paul. 1935. Pa ̄n.ini and the Veda: Studies in the Early History of Linguistic Science
in India. Allahabad: Globe Press.
Vatsyayan, Kapila (ed.). 1992.A Lexicon of Fundamental Concepts in the Indian Arts. New
Delhi: Indira Gandhi National Centre for the Arts.
Verhagen, Pieter C. 1996. “Tibetan Expertise in Sanskrit Grammar – A Case Study:
Grammatical Analysis of the Term pratı ̄tiya-samutpa ̄da,”The Journal of the Tibet Society
8: 21–48.
Weber, Albrecht. 1873. “Ueber den padapa ̄t.ha der Taittirı ̄ya-Sam.hita ̄ ,” Indische Studien
13: 1–128.
Wezler, Albrecht. 1972. “Marginalien zu Pa ̄n.ini’s As.t.a ̄dhya ̄yı ̄ I: stha ̄nin,”Zeitschrift für
vergleichende Sprachforschung86: 7–20.
Whitney, William D. 1871. “The Taittirı ̄ya-Pra ̄ tiça ̄ khya with its Commentary, the
Tribha ̄ shyaratna,” Journal of the American Oriental Society 9: 1–469.
Witzel, Michael. 1997. “The Development of the Vedic Canon and its Schools: The Social
and Political Milieu,” in Witzel, ed., Inside the Texts/Beyond the Texts: New Approaches
to the Study of the Vedas. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Wujastyk, Dominik. 1993. Metarules of Pa ̄n.inian Grammar, 2 vols. Groningen: Egbert
Forsten.
the science of language 359