100 Chapter 3
- In what areas have attitudes toward
men’s and women’s roles become
less traditional over time, and in
what areas have they remained
unchanged? - What is the difference between
hostile and benevolent sexism? - Who is most likely to hold
benevolent sexist beliefs? - What demographic and personality
variables would you expect to
be related to homophobia and
transphobia? - How do gender-role stereotypes
relate to self-perceptions of gender
role discussed in Chapter 2?
6. Why is it difficult to change
gender-role stereotypes? How would
you go about trying to change
someone’s gender-role stereotype?
7. A majority of studies on gender-role
stereotypes have been conducted
on Caucasian, middle-class adults,
typically college students. In what
ways have these samples limited our
research?
8. In what ways does it seem that
stereotypes of women and men have
changed? In what ways, are they the
same?
9. How can gender-role stereotypes be
harmful? Can they ever be helpful?
Discussion Questions
attitudes toward LGBT persons, in the form of
homophobia and transphobia. I presented the
components of gender-role stereotypes and
how those components are influenced by race
and ethnicity, sexual orientation, and age. I
presented data on the problems with gender-
role stereotypes, including how they affect
perception and behavior. There are difficulties
in changing gender-role stereotypes, in
particular because stereotype-inconsistent
behavior is often unnoticed, attributed
to situational causes, or viewed as
more extreme. Sexism and gender-
role stereotyping are antecedents to sex
discrimination, which I discussed in the
context of a Supreme Court ruling that
utilized data on gender-role stereotyping
in reaching its decision.
Biernat, M. (2003). Toward a broader
view of social stereotyping.American
Psychologist, 58, 1019–1027.
Fiske, S. T., Bersoff, D. N., Borgida, E., Deaux,
K., & Heilman, M. E. (1991). Social science
research on trial: Use of sex stereotyping
research inPrice Waterhouse v. Hopkins.
American Psychologist, 46, 1049–1060.
Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (2001). An
ambivalent alliance: Hostile and
benevolent sexism as complementary
justifications for gender inequality.
American Psychologist, 56, 109–118.
Horn, S. S., Kosciw, J. G., & Russell, S. T.
(2009). Special issue introduction: New
research on lesbian, gay, bisexual, and
transgender youth: Studying lives in
context.Journal of Youth and Adolescence,
38 , 863–866.
Martin, C. L., & Ruble, D. N. (2010).
Patterns of gender development.Annual
Review of Psychology, 61, 353–381.
Suggested Reading
M03_HELG0185_04_SE_C03.indd 100 6/21/11 12:22 PM