The Psychology of Gender 4th Edition

(Tuis.) #1
228 Chapter 7

on task outcomes because they are displaying
task-oriented behavior and female groups are
performing better on social outcomes because
they are displaying more positive social be-
havior. It would be more helpful to know that
task behavior contributes to better outcomes
in groups where the mission is to solve a prob-
lem and that positive social behavior contrib-
utes to better outcomes in groups that require
members to come to an agreement.

TAKE HOME POINTS

■ There are differences in the styles women and men exhibit
when interacting in small groups. Women engage in more
positive social behavior (e.g., agreement), and men en-
gage in more task behavior (e.g., providing or asking for
information) and negative behavior (e.g., disagreement).
■ These differences are influenced by whether the group
is composed of same-sex or other-sex persons. In the
presence of the other sex, men and women accommo-
date to each other.
■ These differences also are a function of the nature of
the task. Both women and men exhibit more task-
oriented behavior in areas in which they have expertise.
■ These differences also are more commonly found in
laboratory studies of people who do not know each
other. Interaction styles among people in ongoing rela-
tionships may be influenced by factors other than sex.

Language


Imagine the following interaction:

Person A: I haven’t talked to you in so
long. What’s up?
Person B: I’ve been really stressed out
lately. Things are kind of weird at home.

than men (panel b). Thus men and women
behave most differently from each other when
they are with members of their same sex.
Sex differences in interaction styles also
tend to be greater when the interaction is brief
and among strangers (Aries, 2006). This is the
typical laboratory study. When we have little
information about others besides their sex, we
rely more on category-based expectancies (sex
stereotypes) when making judgments or de-
ciding how to behave. As people get to know
one another and understand each other’s abili-
ties, sex becomes a less important determinant
of interaction behavior. Is it possible that sex
also is a less important determinant of com-
munications in which sex is less visible—that
is, online communication? See Sidebar 7.2 for
a discussion of this research.

Implications of Interaction Styles for Performance


To the extent that women and men do have
different interaction styles, what are the im-
plications for performance? A group’s per-
formance may depend on the match between
the members’ interaction styles and the task
with which the group is faced. Groups that
have task-oriented goals will perform better
when members show task-oriented behav-
ior. Groups focused on a social activity or an
activity that requires consensus will perform
better if members display more positive social
behavior. Consistent with this idea, one study
found that male groups outperformed female
groups when the task required the generation
of ideas, and female groups outperformed
male groups when the task required the group
to reach consensus (Hutson-Comeaux &
Kelly, 1996). One limitation of these studies
is that sex—but not sex-specific interaction
styles—is being linked to group performance.
We assume male groups are performing better

M07_HELG0185_04_SE_C07.indd 228 6/21/11 8:11 AM

Free download pdf